I first became interested in home education as a way of delaying my older daughter's school start by a few years. She was bright, sociable, and obedient. I expect she would have done as well in school as anybody. But still I have never liked the idea of diverting four year olds from their play in order to structure their learning. I wanted her to be free.
We loved everything about home education and I was inspired by the happy older HE children we met. Soon I realised that I'd only send her to school if there were a strong reason to do so, and I couldn't think of any! Social life? What Julie said, LOL.
Along came my second child. Knowing what I now did about home education, I would have wanted to HE her regardless what sort of child she was. The fact she has special needs clinched the deal. Here is what I wrote on another home ed list:
Ellie has "special educational needs." Well, not really. If she went to school, she would. That's one reason she's not going to school.
Mentally, Ellie is about 12 months behind her age peers. What effect does this have on her as a home educated child? None. None whatsoever. She will read and multiply when she's ready, without reference to age-related targets. It's a simple approach.
I'm not saying that special needs vanish for ALL home educated children. I'm saying that for kids like my Ellie, mass education with its standard curriculum and strict age segregation defies common sense. Outside of the school system, her special needs are not an issue.
A four year old with a mental age of three needs to be treated as a three year old. This doesn't happen in the school system. The child lands in Reception alongside four year olds, to be exposed to the standard Reception curriculum, which is inappropriate for her. Provided the SEN system works as it's supposed to (though there are plenty of ways it can go wrong), she is assessed and given "extra help" to access this inappropriate curriculum. It's a tortuous process.
Well, that process seems daft to me. To me, that process would be like keeping my daughter's toys on a shelf seven feet high, then lifting her up countless times a day so she can "access" them. Far simpler to keep her toys where she can reach them, giving her independence and unlimited access to the toys. Besides, why remind the child countless times a day that she is too short to reach the shelf, that she has been measured and found wanting, that she needs "extra help"? In fact, there is nothing wrong with her. It's the shelf which is in the wrong place.
Hardly a day goes by when I don't think how wonderful it is that my daughter remains quite innocent of how she compares to other children her age. She doesn't know that her "peers" can produce more than a scribble, remember a nursery rhyme, and read a bit. She mixes with many children in different situations. But without school, there is no hyper-awareness of being "behind." She's an individual who is learning at her own rate and in her own way. She isn't a defective train which can't keep to schedule and must be pushed to "catch up."