I can tell by your post that you are easy-going and probably a good person to have in one's life, but I am going to push back a bit on your statement that "the overall effect" which is your standard is not necessarily wrong, just different.
Yes, there is some truth to that statement, but only as it applies to everyone else with that standard.
Your approach of being concerned with the "overall effect" rather than the detail is the "Monet Tactic," as in the artist Claude Monet. From a good distance, his works are a beautiful harmony of color, form and subject, but up close, if one only looks at a portion, it can appear disordered and chaotic, and without the big picture, problematic. But, fortunately, in the artist's case, people judge the sum of all parts, typically, rather than noticing and judging based on the detail.
But that is a framed painting or canvas that is placed on a clean, professionally painted wall. Home improvement projects are not the same. A chipped kitchen counter . . . a damaged shower basin . . . paint splatters on the floors and tile . . . are not a work of art. So, while other people who subscribe to the Monet view of judging a project won't necessarily find fault, people like the OP and others concerned with the quality of all the parts that make up the whole, will find fault, and see a problem.
And here is where things do shift, in my opinion, from just being "different standards" to "being good and bad standards" or "high quality vs low quality standards." A person that is detail-oriented with high standards creates an end- product that people with both perspectives or standards will not find fault with, while a person who is NOT detail-oriented and has lower standards, and only cares what their work looks like from a distance will have their work disappoint people of high-quality standards.