Hi mumoverseas, as I said before, the timing and duration of the strike would be decided by the union. I think a lot of cabin crew were shocked (as ess said) by the length and timing but the union would obviously have done this so that BA would take them seriously.
I don't remember the "smug" person on the Christmas thread but if someone was stirring things up, then obviously they're not very intelligent.
Crew have had allowances cut in the past and have had pay conditions changed and have accepted it but this potential strike is about other things.
ilovemydog, some hotels are nice, others not so nice (a lot of hotels too, are being downgraded and I have stayed in some really rough places miles from anywhere). Lots of jobs have perks though don't they? A nice hotel is no compensation though from being away from your family or missing your childs' birthday or christmas nativity(yes, I know, if you have chosen to do that kind of job then it comes with the territory and I agree). BA are massively inflexible when it comes to changing rosters-but that's a whole other subject!!
I would say that the vast majority of crew don't WANT to strike but feel they HAVE to, or in fact, THREATEN to strike. I have worked through strikes before(was in a non striking union at the time) and you can be in a hotel for days not knowing where you will end up-very difficult for crew with families and family commitments. Obviously, I'm aware that this would not compare to the distress of passengers who would have had once-in-a-liftime trips and important travel plans disrupted or cancelled.
I don't really want to post anymore as I don't want to get into a huge debate over this. I just really wanted to stick up for my ex-colleagues. The vast majority are not stuck-up, champagne swilling, party animals-they are normal, decent people who care about doing a good job and want BA to continue to be a great company, not a cheap nasty imitation of itself in years to come.