Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Holidays

Use our Travel forum for recommendations on everything from day trips to the best family-friendly holiday destinations.

Would you fly 11 hours for 7 nights?

73 replies

rear · 12/03/2024 13:17

We want to do a Safari in Zimbabwe or Botswana. We have a week's annual leave, and are not particularly interested in hanging around after the safari. The bonus is that there is only 2 hours time difference.

So we are looking at flying into Johannesburg and doing the safari from there. At a max we can do 8 nights if we fly out late Friday and back over Sunday night into the Monday. We'd probably fly in premium rather than economy.

OP posts:
Eyesopenwideawake · 12/03/2024 13:18

I went to LA for 5 nights last year, no problem. If you can sleep on a plane you'll be fine.

Peekaboobo · 12/03/2024 13:20

I would definately.

Bear in mind that most of the travel involves travelling to the airport, waiting to check in, waiting to board, waiting to get suitcase at other end and then transport to your destination. Thats where the bulk of the time is spent. Adding a few hours to the flight time makes hardly any difference - in fact, I've start going further afield on this very basis.

Have a lovely holiday.

Precipice · 12/03/2024 13:21

Yes, of course. A week's stay is a week's stay, which is a decent amount of time.

mitogoshi · 12/03/2024 13:31

I have done similar and more - 5 hours each way of my travel time occurs even if it's a short flight anyway (2 hours drive, an hour to park, find shuttle bus, get stuck in traffic, 2 hours check in the security) well if my local airport has the destination I can save a couple of hours as the car park is walking distance to terminal and it's only 40 minutes drive.

Anyway just because it's 10 hours makes less difference than you think but is more tiring

BiddyPop · 12/03/2024 13:32

Well, I flew 7 hours a couple of weeks ago for 7 nights for work. Economy.

I did 11 hours plus a 90 minute connection to a previous 10 day work event (flew business when it was the older upright seats so equivalent of premium economy these days).

And have flown 7/8 hours a number of times for 6-14 nights on the North Atlantic continent (a mix of various US states and Canada) for holidays. Mostly economy, one leg business again just before the planes were upgraded . And 90 minute connection to an 11 hour economy flight to China for sports event for teen DC, 10 day trip.

All those were cutting straight across so time zone differences.

DH used to do Jo'burg frequently and always in economy - 2 weeks there and 2 here on rotation for 4 years. He found that much easier once he figured out sleeping on the plane than going sideways across timezones. Eye mask on and podcasts in headphones so at least properly resting even if not sleeping - 1 glass of wine to relax but otherwise drink water.

PixellatedPixie · 12/03/2024 13:32

Of course! I know role who work between London and Joburg and do that trip twice a month. There isn’t even a big time difference.

Bostoncremecolor · 12/03/2024 13:35

I once did 5 nights in Tokyo and would do it again.

It is nice to stay longer but sometimes you just need to work with what you have got!

Lesina · 12/03/2024 13:38

Yep, did 14 hours to Phuket over Christmas for 6 nights. Would happily do it again.

OldLabMummy · 12/03/2024 13:40

Generally no, but I would, and have done, if I was travelling to Southern Africa. It’s the jet lag that I struggle with so no issues when not changing time zones. Have a wonderful time.

Appleblum · 12/03/2024 13:48

I generally like to stay 1 night for every hour of flight time but in this case since there isn't much time difference, I'd do it.

WhatATimeToBeAlive · 12/03/2024 13:49

I'd fly 11 hours for two nights of sun at the moment😆

Rosiiee · 12/03/2024 13:51

Yes absolutely! Just pop a sleeping pill on the way over and you’ll be fine!

Roryhon · 12/03/2024 13:52

Yes, and there’s barely any time difference, so even better.

Jessforless · 12/03/2024 13:58

Because I’d just had a baby and didn’t want to leave her for too long, I went to LA for 2 nights, essentially one day for a wedding. Was fine, and that’s further with a lot of jet lag.

enjoy your trip!

Alloveragain3 · 12/03/2024 13:58

Yep, and no time difference (I think), so easy for your body clock to cope and you don't miss a day sleeping

InTheRainOnATrain · 12/03/2024 14:01

Yes absolutely! It’s not even like you have to worry about adjusting to local time either.

Nonewclothes2024 · 12/03/2024 18:14

Definitely yes

fleurneige · 12/03/2024 18:16

No, we have a long haul rule - 3 weeks minimum. And short-haul, 1 week min.

UnePersonne · 12/03/2024 18:16

Yes I would. Not with young children though! Enjoy op 😊

LlynTegid · 12/03/2024 18:18

Only for something such as to visit a sick relative, or perhaps at a push to a similar timezone.

Springtime43 · 12/03/2024 18:19

Lesina · 12/03/2024 13:38

Yep, did 14 hours to Phuket over Christmas for 6 nights. Would happily do it again.

Last time I went to Phuket it was 12 hours (from London)?!

Panicmode1 · 12/03/2024 18:23

We flew to BC for skiing at half term...to Kelowna via Vancouver - think the LHR to Vancouver leg was about 10...so yes, and it was definitely worth it!

It was just my husband and me though - wouldn't have done it with small children.

Kwasi · 12/03/2024 18:25

Yes, especially as SA is a similar time zone to the UK.

samarrange · 12/03/2024 18:52

Maybe for Africa where the time difference is minimal. Not to the Americas or Asia. I went to the US west coast for a week for work once and it was hell. I'd just got over 8 hours of jet-lag and then had to reverse it, and that was with somebody else paying.

Longma · 12/03/2024 18:53

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.