@newname12345
"you will be sat in a seat next to (maybe over the aisle or directly behind) a child at no extra cost. You want to sit in seats of your choosing then pay for it."
Seating me in the row behind my 2yo child is ridiculous and no benefit to the poor sod who'd be expected to sit next to him. I wouldn't have to request a swap because that person would probably beg me to swap with them. I guess I could say no and enjoy a quiet flight with no young child stepping all over me !
This isn't about what I want, it's about the (fairly basic and obvious) fact that young children can't be expected to sit alone, even if their parent is in the row behind. And the company knows this, otherwise they'd just tell me to sit where my seat was assigned. They're taking the piss by expecting people to pay a whopping fourty bucks for something that costs them nothing.
"It really is very simple and it is a tried and tested way of keeping fares low. I don't want to pay to sit near DH, I don't want to take big suitcases with me, I don't want extra legroom or to board the plane before everyone else."
But these are all options. I don't have a problem with better seats costing extra (though the prices are ridiculous), and boarding in advance does require extra organisation which I'm fine paying for if I want it. Hold luggage costs in terms of handling fees and fuel. But these are all options. Not sitting next to my child isn't an option though - it is not something I can just suck up and say "never mind". It is a necessity.
And seating people together in any case costs the airline absolutely nothing. They are not better seats, we are going to have to be seated somewhere. So why go out of their way to seat us apart ?
What gets to me the most is that the company is getting out of their way (purposely seating people apart) to create an artificial need that they can then make you pay to solve. That's just plain dishonest.
What's next, paying for the air I breathe onboard the plane ?
"I want cheap flights. I'm happy that those options exist for others that do want to sit in specific seats and opt for extras."
As I said I'm happy to pay for extras that are actual extras. Things that are in short supply or that create additional costs for the company should rightly be charged. Seating together people who book together isn't an extra though. Charging anything for that is ridiculous but charging fourty bucks is just laughable.
" Your way means scrapping the cheap flights for people like me just because you expect everything included from the outset. Bit selfish."
Your way means that I'm essentially subsidizing your flight by paying for "extras" that aren't actually costing the company anything. Bit selfish.