Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

History club

Whether you're interested in Roman, military, British or art history, join our History forum to discuss your passion with other MNers.

Recording a death?

2 replies

AnnieKenneyfanclub · 17/11/2020 18:34

Hello, I am looking into some events from my family history and I was hoping someone might be able to help me answer a question about a death certificate.

My great, great grandmother died in 1905 and the death was reported by her son. The cause of death was given as a cerebal hemmorage, so a stroke. All makes sense so far.

What I am wondering is how the cause of death would have been decided? The family were living in dire poverty, I think it unlikely that they would have been able to afford a doctor. (The son was sole earner and he was only 15)? Am I right in thinking it was unlikely they would have taken her to a hospital if she had no hope of recovery? They were in Scotland if that would make a difference?

If this is the case, would there have automatically been an autopsy as there would be now? Or if the deceased had not been seen by a doctor who would have decided what the cause of death was?

I would be very grateful if anyone could shed any light on this please.

OP posts:
AnnieKenneyfanclub · 17/11/2020 21:53

Bump

OP posts:
samenwitch · 04/04/2021 19:32

A lot of doctors based their cause of death on any account of the patient's condition prior to death and/or the condition of the body. Brain haemorrhages have a variety of telltale symptoms, so it could be that the son was able to tell the doctor that his mum had been confused, complaining of head and eye pain, vomiting, losing fine motor skills etc.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page