Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Higher education

Talk to other parents whose children are preparing for university on our Higher Education forum.

What is your history graduate doing next?

85 replies

Treviarpelli · 19/05/2026 08:23

Dd seems a bit clueless as to what to do with her history degree. Not averse to further study if necessary but would probably prefer to get started on a career.
Didnt apply for grad jobs this year as just got there head down with getting her degree but is feeling a bit rudderless now

OP posts:
Historian0111101000 · Yesterday 11:20

childoftkty · Yesterday 10:32

I think the advice is good here. If your child has a history degree from a decent university, has some work experience, puts themselves out and about developing their leadership skills e.g working as a scout leader, being on the membership committee of a society, hs been a school prefect, worked as a youth leader etc they are going to be a far more attractive prospect than those who don’t get involved with anything.

For what it’s worth I’m not seeing my young grads peers struggling to get decent jobs. They may have taken a bit longer than they’d like but they’re picking up the law training contracts policy jobs, engineering that they all wanted from the off. It is harder, yes, but not one of them is out of work or in a min wage passing the time job

For what it’s worth I’m not seeing my young grads peers struggling to get decent jobs.

I don’t agree. I work with plenty of BA and MA holders in humanities who are doing minimum-wage jobs because they can’t find anything in their field.

I think these Mumsnet posts like “oh, just get a job in a museum or archive” are absolutely ridiculous. Anyone working in the heritage sector would know how competitive and difficult it is. Even if you do get a role, you end up working for years on minimum wage and/or hourly-paid contracts.

The issue is that people used to be able to get jobs with a history degree because it gives you a wide range of transferable skills. That was more common before all these very specific university courses appeared—now, if you want to be an archivist, you need a dedicated degree.

History is too broad; you need to decide which direction to take and do additional courses, maybe an MA, plus plenty of volunteering if you want to do anything in the sector.

If you’re happy to pursue other paths, you may have better chances. But one thing is for sure: the job market is brutal out there.

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · Yesterday 11:24

the job market has had many bad moments, it definitely was when I graduated in 2010. I think it’s quite normal for grads to have a time doing minimum wage jobs prior to getting on a grad scheme/ training course.
The difference might be less availability of the minimum wage jobs though.

HairyCalifornia · Yesterday 12:11

Historian0111101000 · Yesterday 11:20

For what it’s worth I’m not seeing my young grads peers struggling to get decent jobs.

I don’t agree. I work with plenty of BA and MA holders in humanities who are doing minimum-wage jobs because they can’t find anything in their field.

I think these Mumsnet posts like “oh, just get a job in a museum or archive” are absolutely ridiculous. Anyone working in the heritage sector would know how competitive and difficult it is. Even if you do get a role, you end up working for years on minimum wage and/or hourly-paid contracts.

The issue is that people used to be able to get jobs with a history degree because it gives you a wide range of transferable skills. That was more common before all these very specific university courses appeared—now, if you want to be an archivist, you need a dedicated degree.

History is too broad; you need to decide which direction to take and do additional courses, maybe an MA, plus plenty of volunteering if you want to do anything in the sector.

If you’re happy to pursue other paths, you may have better chances. But one thing is for sure: the job market is brutal out there.

You're lumping History in with the rest of Humanities, which is your first mistake. Creative Writing degrees are less likely to lead to law, accountancy, archive and governmental positions generally. But I do agree that a specific MA helps direct the career of a History grad, better than just the basic BA.

CheeseNPickle3 · Yesterday 13:47

I'm reading all this with interest. I have a year 12 who is trying to decide what to do at university. She's doing English language, literature and History (Predicted grades A, A, A) and doesn't have a plan for after university. Does anybody have any advice about how you pick a history degree? Are they very different from each other?

She likes some of the earlier history, rather than 20th century or the politics stuff and for English she mostly enjoys doing the creative writing aspects.

She's not sure whether she'd be better doing combined English lit and History, or whether that'd be a mistake.

HelenaWilson · Yesterday 14:22

Does anybody have any advice about how you pick a history degree? Are they very different from each other?

The structure and content - that is modules offered, which modules are compulsory, assessment methods - can vary widely from one university to another. She needs to look at history courses with her own interests in mind. If she likes writing, she might look for courses with options to do extended essays or a dissertation, for example.

(Bearing in mind that modules offered can depend on the interests of current staff, so there's no guarantee that something offered now will still be on offer when she's in her third year.)

Plus consider whether she's chiefly interested in British, European or World history. Or if she wants to look for a degree specifically in Medieval history, for example.

Module reading lists are usually available online. Looking at those will also give her an idea of the content and approach.

EffortlesslyDirected · Yesterday 14:28

Mine narrowed down choices by distance from home, not wanting to be in London and one or two other things (campus v non-campus, grade requirements), then started looking at the history degrees in much more detail.

Piggywaspushed · Yesterday 14:38

Mine ended up doing history by accident! So he was at Birmingham because he really liked that uni and then swapped courses after the first one proved a disaster. Luckily, Birmingham is excellent for history and very supportive.

Had he actually applied for history I suspect he might have chosen Warwick because it has a focus on more modern history and social history, maybe York. He was very drawn to an economic and social history course at Glasgow.

Other unis are quite known for being more international (I'd put Birmingham here) and some more focus on ancient (also Brum) or some on Medieval (York) so it id definitley worth looking at modules - along with the university itself, entrance requirements, employment stats, cost, distance from home - and so on.

Historian0111101000 · Yesterday 14:52

@HairyCalifornia

I was talking about the humanities more generally, as history isn’t the only field that's struggling these days.

Moving into law used to be a viable route, but that’s not really the case anymore. I even considered doing a law conversion course after I couldn’t find a job with my History PhD—even after teaching for over five years at a Russell Group university and having pages of volunteer and paid archival and museum experience on my CV.
But the legal sector is very tough now. Many paralegal and legal secretary roles are being reduced or changed by AI and automation, and finance is facing similar pressures.

The Civil Service is still an option, although plenty of people are now looking to move on from it. I know a lot of people from both humanities and science backgrounds who went into the Civil Service, though, interestingly, not a single historian.

Historian0111101000 · Yesterday 15:05

HelenaWilson · Yesterday 14:22

Does anybody have any advice about how you pick a history degree? Are they very different from each other?

The structure and content - that is modules offered, which modules are compulsory, assessment methods - can vary widely from one university to another. She needs to look at history courses with her own interests in mind. If she likes writing, she might look for courses with options to do extended essays or a dissertation, for example.

(Bearing in mind that modules offered can depend on the interests of current staff, so there's no guarantee that something offered now will still be on offer when she's in her third year.)

Plus consider whether she's chiefly interested in British, European or World history. Or if she wants to look for a degree specifically in Medieval history, for example.

Module reading lists are usually available online. Looking at those will also give her an idea of the content and approach.

I agree.

I remember that many of my students chose the university where I was teaching History because of specific modules, only for the university to cancel them due to low student numbers that year.

I would also look into which universities still offer History MAs. Because of the current financial pressures, some universities have discontinued their master's programmes. That's something I'd take into consideration as well, especially if your child might want to continue their studies after completing a BA.

Ceramiq · Yesterday 15:14

I have a DC graduating this year with a History-adjacent degree and continuing straight into a MA, chosen from many after huge amounts of research (started in second year) across several countries. As others have said, a general History degree is harder to convert to employment than it was a generation ago and mostly requires further study if a young person wants to work in a field related to their discipline.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page