At open days for GSA and Edinburgh (we did both over the weekend), GSA staff came across as far more approachable. Dd liked that.
The GSA website was a mess though (it may have changed now) but it didn’t give a particularly good impression on trying to navigate.
One thing they are keen on I think in both the Portfolio and interview is applicant’s ability to critically reflect on their artistic learning. The pieces don’t have to be perfect (arguably, it’s better if some aren’t as it gives the candidate more space to discuss what went wrong for them and why and how it led to their next steps re development). They value students’ readiness to experiment with new things: ideas; mediums; critical perspectives and a willingness to moce out of what has been their safe and often, very narrow practice to date. Difference, ‘quirkiness’, thinking outside the box are all good things to at least show a readiness to lean into.
Dd’s portfolio told a story of her development so far. She evidenced being able to write coherently and critically. Through their degree at every stage, they are expected to be able to apply critical ideas - dd talked about ‘the body’, politics and gender which were her interests at the time. She was interviewed over teams by 2 staff for aboit 20 minutes. The studentroom is a good place to join to get tips on specific questions asked.
She had applied for direct entry into the second year but they offered her a first year place. On the subsequent welcome day, I asked the head of programme why this was. She said that she knew of dd’s application (though she didn’t interview her) and it was because they thought she would benefit from developing her confidence more and that the first year would offer her space to do that. And she was spot on with this (dd is quite young for her age). So I was impressed with that analysis, consideration and thought in terms of suitability for the course. She voluntary said that if dd was wavering because of this, she’d be happy to talk to her. She said they have over 800-900 applications each year.
What does dd like? Loves Glasgow; loves the cultural and critical modules of the programme ( it was important to her to have this); likes the studio spaces and that it’s ‘edgier’ than Edinburgh. The fact that they are surrounded by students learning woodwork, jewellery making, environmental art, sculpture, etc, is a plus. She likes most of the staff who are all practising artists. She says it’s not got a student party/club scene vibe like Leeds but she’s not into that as much anyway.