I'm looking at doing a Masters after a 10 year career break, but as my degree and post-graduate diploma finished nearly 20 years ago the university are recommending I do a pre-masters. It's over £6.5k for one semester (24 hours a week) or two semesters (12 hours a week), and to say it looks uninspiring is an understatement. I feel like I'm being forced down this route as a cash cow for the university - I know I still have all the skills I need to do a masters, it's just that I don't have recent enough 'evidence'.
So are pre-masters worth it? I'm thinking of doing some other short courses with CATS points and reapplying next year instead. This will save me over £5k and be far more flexible around childcare, plus I can pick subjects that will be more useful to my personal development. But, the pre-masters is a guaranteed route onto the masters and this is not.
I'm also curious to know what actual evidence universities might use as a cut off point when discounting peoples previous studies. I had a quick search and couldn't find any relevant research, is there any out there? I'm feeling like this is a form of sex based discrimination, as it will mostly be women who take longer career breaks and then have to commit more time and money to achieving new qualifications. My children have various special needs, which is a major factor in how long my career break has been (10 years). This feels like an additional discrimination. They've not interviewed me, or eg asked me to complete an assignment to assess my abilities. Just told me I need a pre-masters, and not replied when I asked what other routes might be acceptable.
Any thoughts or experiences welcomed.