@Needmoresleep
Percy,
If we didn’t pay, arts students would be the preserve of the rich so we even out opportunity. I’m delighted to support musicians and artists.
There are other ways. My old University has a bursary fund which genuinely helps provide opportunity and is far more targeted. And they invite donors for the occasional, and slightly rough, glass of wine.
I had such a bursary. It was £1250 a year. I also had a £4-6k yearly scholarship. I’ve lost count of all the receptions I attended or played for, where we met the donors.
Now please explain to me how to live on £6-7k a year in London? My cheap houseshare for the area I was in was £600 a month. There is food. There are clothes. There is a slightly higher energy bill in winter. There is transport. Books, specific music software (unless you manage to book a 30 min slot at the university library which will give you enough time to complete 2% of your assessment), accompanists, instrument maintenance, sheet music, insurances, occasional travel home for holidays.
My bursaries and scholarships didn’t even cover my rent. I worked 3 part time jobs on top of conservatoire, practice and concerts, as many people do, loan or no loan.
I’ll be eternally grateful to both my private donors and my Student Finance England tuition fee loan (aka the taxpayer) for helping me attend university. My parents had £0 to contribute towards my higher education. I was encouraged to study if I wanted, but I had to sort it out. Without student loans, which I will be paying when I start earning the minimum amount, I wouldn’t have been able to become a professional musician. So yeah, music would remain a preserve of the rich if we didn’t help those from a poorer background to access it.