Just trying to get an external perspective on fairness of approach.
I have 2 DSs in uni. 1 lives at home and travels. Requires use of car and then train. Now in Yr 3 of 5 year course. Other lives away as uni is 2.5 hours away. Can walk to uni and into town. Yr2 of 4 year course.
The aim was to support them both to the point that they could save their maintenance loan. We aren't high earners but have saved and live a modest lifestyle so have disposable income. We and they are aware that things change in life so support might not always be possible.
Neither son is grabby or expects anything.
So, what we have done is pay for ds2s accommodation and give him £250 a month to cover food etc. Ds1 obviously gets his accommodation and food already supplied. He also gets £250 to cover petrol and train fares. We pay for car maintenance, insurance etc. DS2 uses the car when home and puts his own petrol in.
We pay for things such as opticians, dentists, mobile phone etc.
We pay for the occasional take away at home and I'll do the odd extra shop for DS2, pay his train fare if coming home/slip him the odd ten or 20 quid if we've taken DS1 out for dinner etc. Ds1 rarely goes anywhere without us, rarely uses car if not for going to uni.
They are supposed to pay an amount equivalent to their loan into their ISA. Ds1 does this, DS2 hasn't. I have no idea how he is doing for money as he avoids talking about it other than to say he has enough. I didn't stop the payments over the summer. DS2 put a fair bit if petrol in car visiting his girlfriend and went out (when it was allowed) a few times a week so will have spent some or all of the £250 per month.
OK, so now most stuff is online. DS2 has gone back to uni as his room was paid for and he wanted to. Ds1 will be unlikely to be going into uni at least until next year. So essentially Ds1 has all his money and no need to spend any but DS2 still needs to feed himself.
I should be giving him more really to put him in the same position as Ds1? Or am I then punishing Ds1 for not spending his?
Fairness isn't always equality so just wondering what you would do?
Obviously I appreciate that other people might not have the will or resources to provide similar funding to their DC.