Sorry, I have to disagree. Almost all DS' friends lived quite close to LSE in their second and third years. OK nothing as luxurious as those in other Universities expected: ex-council, small bedroom, no living room, but once you factored in the fact you could walk to University in 10 minutes and that you could study in the library - open 24 hours, and there was not an issue.
Rent hikes elsewhere, particularly Bristol, but perhaps Exeter, have been substantial. The introduction of HMO legislation, more people living somewhere nice and only commuting occasionally, University expansion, have meant less of a differential.
I started posting on this board about six years ago, as I could not understand why people were not supporting studying at world class Universities in London. I appreciate that MN has a significant Oxbridge focus, but in many subjects the quality of a UCL education will be just as good. And indeed the name recognition outside the UK, just as strong. That first thread was about Imperial and it later transpired that posters did not have DC at Imperial nor indeed had DC who were studying STEM.
It really is horses for courses. Those who love UCL really love it. One of DD's friends dropped out of a humanities subject at Bristol, which seems to be University du jour on MN though I am not completely sure why, in order to transfer to UCL. A friends DD dropped out of Exeter and transferred to RHC. We also know people who moved in the opposite direction: Imperial to Bristol and so on.
I am sure I will never convince some people that London is a good place to study, and indeed it is not for everyone. But I can do my best to try and dispel myths.
- UCL guarantees accommodation to first year.
- Students do manage to live nearby, and certainly for some, social life is not dismal. Being a student in London is a unique experience, very different from working there. There is lots to do and lots is free. nd from what I hear, the UCL campus is lively with lots of societies.