OK, so your later posts are much more indicative of your situation.
Of course I know this is an informal MB but taking on a PhD isn't just like doing random research: it's a huge investment of resource your time & money, and the university's time & money. And there are pressures all round for picking only the best candidates: ones who demonstrate that they have the skills and stickability to finish what is a very arduous task. So your later posts suggest a much more focussed area of research. We'd be looking at ability to keep to the task, ability to write & research independently you'll see a supervisor once a month and after the first year of candidature I don't chase supervisees: it's their job to set their own deadlines and contact me & when they want a supervision.
The reason I asked about previous degrees is because what we look at are several factors I've known quite brilliant people who've not finished PhDs because while they are brilliant they don't have the sheer determination to do a major piece of work in 3 years (or PT equivalent). But you do need to have some evidence of recent study your MA in Translation in 2005 is a good start, but at my place (& other research universities I've worked at) we'd probably not accept you straight into the PhD but enrol you in an MPhil first, and then after about a year FT (or PT equivalent) you'd do an upgrade. It's what I did -- I wrote 25,000 words at the end of my first year over that Long Vac., and tat was my upgrade/transfer to PhD candidature. It's a good thing: it means you end your first year with a substantial wodge of yor first draft, and you also show that:
- your project is of Doctoral standing (it's an original contribution to knowledge)
- you have the skills and the ability to complete it
- you have a realistic schedule for completion and a realistic plan for the dissertation
Other posters have given you great advice about finding a supervisor. Another thing you should look out for are funded PhD studentships which are connected wit large research projects: I had one of those for a large research project I am Principal Investigator for and it's a great experience for the candidate: she's had a free ride to several conferences, including one where she's given a paper; she's had the extra input of my Postdoc Fellow, and my research collaborator (it helps that I'm a pushy supervisor and drive her hard!). Her work wasn't quite ready for us to publish in one of the books we're doing, but if it had been, she would have been a central part of that, too.
But often people dismiss those opportunities in the Humanities because they think they have their own personal; project and nothing else will do. They don't realise that this kind of Doctoral research, as part of a larger project, can be very malleable -- my student had a very broad brief and she adapted it, changed it from what we'd envisaged, but it's all the better for that. As is her input to the project overall.
Another form of funding that comes yp is a Collaborative Doctoral Award (CDA) which is a joint supervision between a university researcher and a non-HEI institution. I';m irking on an application for one of those at the moment, with a literary organisation. The candidate will spend some time doing outreach work for the organisation as a complement to the PhD research, and so develop a brilliant non-HEI network as., let's face it, there ar fewer & fewer straight lecturing jobs going, so new PhDs need to look beyond the academy.
I'm afraid most funding opportunities for the 2013-14 academic year have passed, and in the fields you're looking at, it's very competitive.
We're in the middle of selection at my place and we've had around 30 applications for around 6 funded PhD studentships, and we have a lot of funding compared to most humanities faculties. We're looking at an excellent first degree in a cognate discipline (or equivalent) and a Merit or Distinction at Masters. In your situation, I think you'd need to say something about a change in interests/career etc and equivalent life/work place skills rather than the first degree.
And Funding opportunities are all full-time. I doubt there's very much funding for part-time PhD study, I'm afraid. Universities are better about understanding PT candidatures, but they are wary of them I know it sounds unfair, but there are good reasons. A PhD is far more than 40 hours a week, and sometimes a PT candidate can get very distracted. It needs a lot of grit and good management by both candidate & supervisor to keep a part-timer on track. It's why I crack the whip 3 years seems a long time but it's not! So I think you'd need to show how you realistically aim to do the work. And then be very good at keeping track my supervisees are lucky I end every supervision with a quick review of where they're at in relation to their submission date. We always get out our diaries!
As for a research proposal that's a great suggestion to try writing one. Generally any application to study will require one (and if they don't frankly I'd run a mile they're not a place that takes research seriously). You'd need to outline:
- the broad area of research
- the research problem (what don't we know that we want to find out?)
- the general and then specific research questions you want to pursue
- the body of evidence or primary sources you'll use
- the body of scholarship already extant (secondary sources and theoretical framework)
- the methods by which you will investigate the evidence to answer your research questions
- your hypothesis
I'd want 1,000-1,500 words. It also gives the Department/ potential supervisor a chance to see how you write.
Whew! My students called me a research nerd yesterday -- I think you can see why!
(I'm a Director of Research & oversee our PG admissions with our PG director, and I have 2 first degrees & my PhD all in different areas, and teach in a 4th area, so know about interdiscip. from the inside)
Hope this helps