My son is currently predicted ABB with a fourth B/C for his 4 A levels. He has been made offers from all five universities he applied to.
He has applied for a joint hons course.
Sussex (asking for an AAB from him, even though the course requirements say only ABB to apply.)
UEA (ABB)
Birmingham (ABB)
and then two others, both decent places and 'proper' unis, who will take slightly less, or a UCAS points accumulated value, or are just less fussy about which grades come in which subjects.
Our fist choice would have been Sussex, but he is not feeling confident he can make the 2 A's they want. He feels if he puts it first it will be a wasted choice. He could pull it out of the hat, but it's a gamble he's reluctant to take, which is a real shame as it seems to be storming up the ranks and would be such a great place to live for him.
He is pretty confident he'll get what he needs for UEA and he really loves it there. It is not an RG or redbrick university, although it is very well established (since the 60s') is not a modern poly convert, and seems quite highyl regarded. It gets exceptionally good feedback for the course he will be doing. (one of the highest ranked in the country, and certainly pretty much joint with Sussex and many of the RG unis for that course/faculty)
Then we come to Birmingham. It's Russell Group. They will take him more readily than the above two, beacuse they are less fussy about the order of his grades/subjects. But the feedback for his course is a bit lacklustre. Where Sussex and UEA were scoring very high 80s and 90s out of 100% for just about everything, B'ham was around the 60%-65% mark for everything. I'm not sure how this feedback compares with other courses they do (it's obviously a good uni but perhaps the faculty my son needs is a bit weak there?) and I'm not sure how it compares to other courses' feeback across the board.
It's back to the age old question. How important is it to have an RG university on your CV versus a (good) non-RG one? can even an RG university be crap at something?