Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

Guest post: "A child's first five years are a golden window of opportunity"

102 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 30/03/2016 10:32

If you're reading this as the proud owner of a three-year-old, you'll be pleased to hear their brain is twice as active as yours. This isn't because he or she is a genius, but because a child's brain is far busier during those pre-school years than at any other time in life. In fact, by the time your child starts school, their brain will be almost the same size as your own. Not at all terrifying.

The first five years set the foundations for your child's life. During this time their brain will develop rapidly, absorbing information like a sponge. This explains why your child is shuffling round on their bum begging to be picked up one day, and cruising round on their feet the next, using new words on a daily basis, throwing their wellies into the washing machine or occasionally even listening to what you're saying. This "golden window" of opportunity offers children huge potential for language and communication development, and for developing the skills they need to be ready for school.

This is why Save the Children want to see an early years teacher leading every nursery in the country. The organisation is campaigning for an investment in early years education to make this happen, so children get the help they need to develop when their brains are busiest getting ready for the future.

Read On Get On is a national campaign to get children reading and today, as part of the initiative, Save the Children has released a paper on the science behind the remarkable early steps taken by young children. As parents, we do whatever it takes to give our children the best start in life. Save the Children and a team at UCL looked at how we could do this even better during those crucial years.

The key to starting school ahead, the research shows, is verbally engaging with toddlers - by reading, singing, rhyming - all the stuff we often do without thinking. However, without this verbal engagement, children risk not having the language skills they need and can find themselves falling behind by the time they start school. Sadly, if a child starts behind, they are far more likely to stay behind.

When a child is born they already have most of the 86 billion neurons that we do as fully grown adults. Neurons form networks in the brain that allow children to learn everything they need for life, like being able to walk, talk and relate to their environment. In the first few years a child's brain is forming these connections at about twice the speed of an adult's brain.

A child's language skills also develop rapidly, expanding, on average, from 55 words at 16 months to 572 words at 30 months. That's a lot of talking back to prepare for. Language is so important because it's through talking and listening that children learn about and explore the world. But it's also through language that a child's brain develops crucial skills like memory and reading.

As a child grows older, it becomes more difficult to influence the way their brain processes information because the networks in the brain firm up and become more complex and efficient. Of course children will continue growing and developing throughout their lives, but it becomes harder and harder to influence their development.

So it really is the early experiences in a child's life that create a foundation for their development. Parents and carers play a vital role and there's so much we can do to support our child's early learning. And it really doesn't have to feel like learning - everyday stuff like talking and reading books helps to stimulate children's language skills right from birth. From games like peepo with babies, to talking to toddlers in short sentences about their surroundings - these can all help build your child's brain. There are more examples here of the different things you can do with babies, toddlers and pre-schoolers to encourage development.

Save the Children is asking the government to ensure there is an early years teacher in every nursery in England because, as our lives get busier, more and more two, three and four year-olds are going to some form of childcare every week.

This isn't about turning nurseries into classrooms. But, early years teachers are specialists in children's development, who ensure the right mix of learning through play. They can identify children who are struggling and help nursery assistants give the best possible support for children. They can also offer parents specialist advice and information.

Getting a good start in life can make a real difference to a child's life. With the help of nurseries and parents, we can make this a reality for every child.

You can sign Save the Children's petition calling for a commitment to investing in early years education, and an early years teacher leading every nursery, here.

Dr Elizabeth Kilbey is a consultant clinical psychologist, Oxleas NHS Trust, and an expert on The Secret Life Of 4, 5 and 6 Year Olds.

OP posts:
ceara · 31/03/2016 13:14

If these years are crucial (and I agree they are), why isn't their more support for children with language and communication difficulties? My son is nearly 3, has only 7 words and the NHS speech and language team won't give him one to one therapy until he is 3yrs 6 month.

This. Well said familyvonstrop

The blog post and Telegraph article are depressing reading for those of us with speech delayed toddlers/preschoolers, for whom no useful help seems to be available during this "light bulb moment" as the article puts it.

Lottapianos · 31/03/2016 13:19

ceara, I'm part of an NHS speech and language team and I agree with you - this government never seem to have heard the words 'early intervention' before. The service I work for is woefully understaffed and under resourced and its similar all over the country. Its just not good enough

corythatwas · 31/03/2016 13:25

Sorry, Lotta, not blaming you; just pointing out that it is hard for parents not to take these messages on board.

Lottapianos · 31/03/2016 13:36

It's ok cory, I understand and I agree Smile

LittleNelle · 31/03/2016 14:25

Early Years Teachers aren't primary trained, they are trained to work with 0-5 year olds.

Yes, someone with a level 2 or 3 qualification can do an adequate, and often more than adequate job, but someone with a degree or postgraduate qualification will have a better understanding of child development, learning, planning, assessment etc. Staff with higher qualifications lead to high quality care and education.

Many private nurseries are very poor. There is little funding, owners have to keep costs low in order to make a profit, and staff wages are one way they do it. Many nurseries rely on minimum wage workers, apprentices on £2.50 an hour, and subsequently have a high turnover of staff.

If the government wants higher quality early years care and education, they have to pay for it - graduates need graduate wages.

Early Years Teachers/teaching does not mean not play based btw - that seems to be a common misconception. In my experience higher qualified staff are less likely to try to teach phonics or early writing (badly) in nurseries than lower qualified staff because they are more likely to recognise it is developmentally inappropriate. I visit a lot of private settings and often see poorly taught phonics and lots of tracing names and work sheets in pre-school rooms.

zzzzz · 31/03/2016 14:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LittleNelle · 31/03/2016 14:41

It's certainly true that most 2 and 3 year olds and many 4 year olds need to build up their vocabulary, listening and attention and auditory discrimination skills way before they start learning letter-sound correspondences. Group phase 2 phonics sessions are almost never appropriate in toddler or pre-school rooms.

LittleNelle · 31/03/2016 14:42

Though of course I realise that many mumsnetters have extremely gifted toddlers who were reading Harry Potter by their 3rd birthday.

zzzzz · 31/03/2016 14:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Blackberryfields · 31/03/2016 14:54

'Sadly, if a child starts behind, they are far more likely to stay behind'.
I am not entirely in agreement with this sentence because it is too sweeping and deterministic. I have however the counter argument from my experience, DS started reading very early, spoke late, chose to be HE, diagnosed dyslexic and got into a top uni with unconditional offer and did his degree in time. There are children with SLDs (ie dyslexia) that go ahead of many other peers and earn more and many others without SLDs do so. If we stick to this opinion how can we expect anyone with SLDs or other to perform? Some children can and catch up later start at 6 or 7 school and earn a lot higher than early birds.

The article of SaveThe Children is based on poling or opinion and says that early learning is believed to be important for 61% parents but what happens to the 39% of the rest of the children? That is a huge number we dont know about. How did these parents assess the progress when they don't know what someone else’s kid did? These things are too vague to base a education policy on.

Questions the parents should focus are:
Do you worry the school does not challenge your child? Important the parent is directly involved rather than relying on a nanny state.
Is your child underachieving but you feel you should get more from school? Is there a factor such as may be a SLD or attention problem or other you feel? Address this now with a professional ie psychologist.
Do you know the educational needs of your child?
The assessment and teaching of gifted students or of those with learning disabilities requires a unique level of expertise. Probably one might consult privately an EP and have strategies to deal.

LittleNelle · 31/03/2016 14:58

zzzzz - If an individual child in nursery is particularly advanced then there is no reason not to meet their needs. That is not the same as the poor quality group phonics teaching that often happens in nurseries, with staff using poor enunciation of sounds and failing to grasp the difference between letters and sounds (eg. using a shell or ship to represent the sound 's'). I have even seen group Phase 2 phonics teaching in 2 year old rooms. That is not developmentally appropriate.

Blackberryfields · 31/03/2016 14:59

zzzzz I do think so and is my experience. That is what I am saying above.

zzzzz · 31/03/2016 15:06

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LittleNelle · 31/03/2016 15:15

Sitting your group or class of 2 year olds or 3 year olds down and explicitly teaching letter-sound correspondences zzzz.
At that age phonics teaching (for the vast majority of non-gifted children) should be about listening to stories, playing with and recognising noises and sounds, expanding vocabulary, speaking clearly and confidently, recognising rhyme and alliteration. Skipping all these basic skills in order to 'teach phonics' does young children no favours and ime poor phonics teaching in nurseries hinders children in Reception classes.

zzzzz · 31/03/2016 15:55

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LittleNelle · 31/03/2016 16:01

I bow to your greater knowledge of early years teaching then.

zzzzz · 31/03/2016 16:02

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

zzzzz · 31/03/2016 16:45

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LittleNelle · 31/03/2016 16:48

I think I have said clearly that if an individual toddler is ready to read that is a different thing to structured, group phonics teaching in nurseries.

LittleNelle · 31/03/2016 16:52

There may not be 'golden windows' but I can promise you most 2, 3 and 4 year olds are not ready to be taught to read and write and the focus should be on physical, language and social development through play at that age.

JugglingFromHereToThere · 31/03/2016 17:19

I've seen the phonics songs "a,a, ants on your arm etc" sung in a small group with 3 and 4 yr olds in pre-school and felt that was OK - interesting and helpful for the children.
I've also worked as a TA (most recently, and also as a supply teacher) in reception classes and seen how challenging the phonics work was there - felt quite pressurised for 4 yr olds to me. So quite a steep learning curve for them at 4 as things are at present.
So, if reception class is going to remain so challenging then I think it would be reasonable to start some gentle phonics songs in pre-school - similar to what I have experienced.
Of course it might well be better if reception could go a lot more gently too.
There's really no rush, or shouldn't be.
Ideally I'd like to see a lot more emphasis on speaking and listening, stories and play in both nursery/pre-school and reception class.
Everyone says the Scandinavian model is very good - a long time in nursery with lots of outdoor play and forest school style learning

LittleNelle · 31/03/2016 17:24

Most children in Reception will pick up letter sounds quickly if they have all the basics in place. Skipping the basics and pushing formal education onto younger and younger age groups so that children get a head start at school isn't going to work. I'm not sure there is much reason to think familiarity with Jolly Phonics songs at 3 will influence future reading success anyway.

LittleNelle · 31/03/2016 17:26

For example, recognising phonemes in spoken words and oral blending and segmenting are much more useful (for reading and writing) skills for a pre-schooler to develop than learning phonics songs.

JugglingFromHereToThere · 31/03/2016 17:33

It all depends if it is developmentally appropriate for the child and group doesn't it LittleNelle? I'd say some Jolly phonics songs with 4 year olds in nursery or pre-school in the term or two before they go up to reception could well be OK for most - I've seen children enjoy these songs and actions and think they're quite cleverly devised. Especially if there is then going to be quite a challenging phonics programme in reception classes. In my opinion the phonics teaching in many reception classes is too steeply graded for most children's developmental abilities, especially when it gets on to blended phonics. I'd think this could at least wait til Year 1?

LittleNelle · 31/03/2016 17:45

I doubt it will do any harm, but it takes up time that imo could be better spent in uninterrupted play, reading high quality stories or speaking and listening in small groups with an adult. I don't think it gives children an advantage in learning to read the following year.

Swipe left for the next trending thread