Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

Guest post: "A child's first five years are a golden window of opportunity"

102 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 30/03/2016 10:32

If you're reading this as the proud owner of a three-year-old, you'll be pleased to hear their brain is twice as active as yours. This isn't because he or she is a genius, but because a child's brain is far busier during those pre-school years than at any other time in life. In fact, by the time your child starts school, their brain will be almost the same size as your own. Not at all terrifying.

The first five years set the foundations for your child's life. During this time their brain will develop rapidly, absorbing information like a sponge. This explains why your child is shuffling round on their bum begging to be picked up one day, and cruising round on their feet the next, using new words on a daily basis, throwing their wellies into the washing machine or occasionally even listening to what you're saying. This "golden window" of opportunity offers children huge potential for language and communication development, and for developing the skills they need to be ready for school.

This is why Save the Children want to see an early years teacher leading every nursery in the country. The organisation is campaigning for an investment in early years education to make this happen, so children get the help they need to develop when their brains are busiest getting ready for the future.

Read On Get On is a national campaign to get children reading and today, as part of the initiative, Save the Children has released a paper on the science behind the remarkable early steps taken by young children. As parents, we do whatever it takes to give our children the best start in life. Save the Children and a team at UCL looked at how we could do this even better during those crucial years.

The key to starting school ahead, the research shows, is verbally engaging with toddlers - by reading, singing, rhyming - all the stuff we often do without thinking. However, without this verbal engagement, children risk not having the language skills they need and can find themselves falling behind by the time they start school. Sadly, if a child starts behind, they are far more likely to stay behind.

When a child is born they already have most of the 86 billion neurons that we do as fully grown adults. Neurons form networks in the brain that allow children to learn everything they need for life, like being able to walk, talk and relate to their environment. In the first few years a child's brain is forming these connections at about twice the speed of an adult's brain.

A child's language skills also develop rapidly, expanding, on average, from 55 words at 16 months to 572 words at 30 months. That's a lot of talking back to prepare for. Language is so important because it's through talking and listening that children learn about and explore the world. But it's also through language that a child's brain develops crucial skills like memory and reading.

As a child grows older, it becomes more difficult to influence the way their brain processes information because the networks in the brain firm up and become more complex and efficient. Of course children will continue growing and developing throughout their lives, but it becomes harder and harder to influence their development.

So it really is the early experiences in a child's life that create a foundation for their development. Parents and carers play a vital role and there's so much we can do to support our child's early learning. And it really doesn't have to feel like learning - everyday stuff like talking and reading books helps to stimulate children's language skills right from birth. From games like peepo with babies, to talking to toddlers in short sentences about their surroundings - these can all help build your child's brain. There are more examples here of the different things you can do with babies, toddlers and pre-schoolers to encourage development.

Save the Children is asking the government to ensure there is an early years teacher in every nursery in England because, as our lives get busier, more and more two, three and four year-olds are going to some form of childcare every week.

This isn't about turning nurseries into classrooms. But, early years teachers are specialists in children's development, who ensure the right mix of learning through play. They can identify children who are struggling and help nursery assistants give the best possible support for children. They can also offer parents specialist advice and information.

Getting a good start in life can make a real difference to a child's life. With the help of nurseries and parents, we can make this a reality for every child.

You can sign Save the Children's petition calling for a commitment to investing in early years education, and an early years teacher leading every nursery, here.

Dr Elizabeth Kilbey is a consultant clinical psychologist, Oxleas NHS Trust, and an expert on The Secret Life Of 4, 5 and 6 Year Olds.

OP posts:
louise987 · 30/03/2016 19:27

00100001 - check out the marmot report

www.instituteofhealthequity.org/projects/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot-review

Butteredparsnips · 30/03/2016 19:52

The points I wanted to make have already been covered, eloquently by other posters.
Am irritated by the patronising blog. TBH.

thefamilyvonstrop · 30/03/2016 20:51

If these years are crucial (and I agree they are), why isn't their more support for children with language and communication difficulties? My son is nearly 3, has only 7 words and the NHS speech and language team won't give him one to one therapy until he is 3yrs 6 month.

Pammie70 · 30/03/2016 20:52

So what they are trying to say is that children need reading to? How by introducing teachers which changes the ratios from 1:8 to 1:13 does that give anyone time to read to the children. With a typical Pre-school room holding 26 children that means 2 members of staff not 4. Who is going to be dealing with little accidents, doing all the observations and children's learning journeys that Ofsted require, taking the children outside for the motor development that they need to grow the muscles so they can learn to write and just playing with the children? Children will get less individual attention not more. To afford to pay a teacher Pre-school's and Nursery's won't be able to have additional staff.

In the meantime the industry is loosing qualified, experienced, caring staff because they can get paid more money doing a cleaning job!

Theleavesonthetrees · 30/03/2016 21:03

I've just clicked on the link to the petitions and doesn't mention teachers in nurseries at all. It just has a vague statement about improving the quality of nurseries. If Save the Children are going to use this to argue there is support for nursery teachers I think that is very dishonest. I also think it is odd for the guest poster tobe encouraging us to sign such a uselessly vague petition to support her very specific aims.

pearlylum · 30/03/2016 21:20

Quite insulting to parents.

Home is often the best place for early years education.

Nigglenaggle · 30/03/2016 21:44

Some people need or want to use nurseries and yes, having a teacher in each one would be lovely. Are Save the Children going to pay for this? Because already we are hearing nurseries say fees are going to have to go up because the money they get for the free places is not enough. The new minimum wage is already likely to push this up and some families will struggle to pay for the hours they need. Money doesn't grow on trees. Where will the government find this as well as saving the NHS and investing in mental health?

But as others have said, the bit that angers me the most is the assumption that children are better taken from their parents and placed with a bunch of other toddlers who surprise surprise, have poor language skills. A teacher of a group cannot at this stage replace one on one attention from a parent. The harm done with this campaign is its reinforcement of the idea that it's someone else's job to teach your child.

JolieMadame · 30/03/2016 21:46

I have read the telegraph article on this and I'm really not sure what StC are trying to achieve here and why.

They seem to base this on parental low expectations of toddlers (thanks for the support there StC!) but this all seems to hinge around parental expectations to do with language. So, when questioned parents underestimate how many words their toddlers should know.

I wouldn't even be able to begin to guess how many words my two year old has. It wouldn't surprise me in the least to not be within 100 words of my toddlers actual language acquisition when guessing.

Just seems a huge non event to me and if StC are that bothered maybe they should be spending their own money rather than our taxes.

corythatwas · 30/03/2016 22:12

If anyone had asked me how many words an average toddler should have I would simply have repeated some figure I had read in the literature provided/heard from the HV. I would not have taken it as asking how many words my toddler did have or how much effort I put into stimulating their language development. And like Jolie, I wouldn't have known how many words they had anyway.

musiceverywhere · 30/03/2016 22:37

Did no one else read this the same way I did? I don't think for a moment that StC is trying to target my child (although I'm happy to sign this petition and love the EYT at DD nursery) or indeed the children of previous posters. I read this as being aimed at the sadly growing number of children being raised in homes where there are very few/no books/toys, limited verbal interaction and age appropriate play opportunities and for whom the free hours at nursery are a life saver. These children will start school massively behind, even with the best play based learning. Absolutely it should firstly be the responsibility of the parent, but I think the charity sees a lot of cases where the parent either can't or won't take this on and this petition is trying to provide resources to fill that gap. Should the government be tackling the factors that contribute to that parenting? yes, but these children don't have the luxury of time. (and that's a whole other thread)

JolieMadame · 30/03/2016 22:54

music, the question your post raises is why does that person have to be a teacher? Why don't StC think that nursery workers can chat, sing and read to a young child?

musiceverywhere · 30/03/2016 23:19

I'm not well versed in all the various EY qualifications, but from my limited experience with DDs nursery, all the staff in her room are indeed doing all of that, and doing it well. It doesn't have to be a teacher doing it face to face. The petition is for there to be a teacher leading (or employed in?) every nursery. I hope an EY teacher could better explain why their qualifications and skills could only improve provision of the EYFS in a nursery setting. Of course finances will be the sticking point- would fees rise?

JolieMadame · 30/03/2016 23:31

StC want it to come out of taxes.

musiceverywhere · 30/03/2016 23:41

So it's all for naught really. They'll have to wait at least another 4 years. I would gladly support any tax increase for this cause, but I wouldn't trust this government with another penny. They certainly don't seem to lose a lot of sleep over vulnerable children. I suppose the only way forward would be if it was encouraged for nurseries to try and take up this in some form on their own. Maybe a group of nurseries could employ a regular teacher to 'share' (for want of a better word!)

G1raffe · 30/03/2016 23:57

I've often thought I'd far rather experienced pre-school workers running a preschool than a teacher with a few years experience in school possibly with older children.

I want preschool to be playbased and led by people who really "get" little children, not led by people who are class/teaching and learning focused (I'm not anti teachers - I am one!). The one we chose has leaders who are parents/grandparents and they adore the children and really provide a supportive loving environment. I dont want a young potentially nqt or teacher who had come from a background of teaching older children. I want the scenario to be more play based than class focused.

Even looking locally the preschool we chose was playbased and informal. The preschool attached to the school was in a classroom and looked like a school classroom. The HUGe difference in ratio by nature affects interactions as you are teaching a class rather than informally getting involved in whatever the children are choosing to do...

Meeep · 31/03/2016 00:14

I don't want nurseries for two and three year olds to become more like schools. Sounds a horrendous idea.

Mrscog · 31/03/2016 05:38

People often cite European countries where children start school later as a reason to keep children out of preschool settings and at home, but in actual fact even though the curriculum is playbased for 1-2 years longer, most children are in a significant amount of childcare from around 18 months.

BoboChic · 31/03/2016 06:22

French pre-school (maternelle) lasts for three years (3 to 6) and is taught by primary school teachers in classes of up to 30 DC but there is very little in the way of reading and writing. It is largely focused on acquiring aural/oral language skills and socially acceptable behaviour, often through play. TBH it's a great social leveller.

JugglingFromHereToThere · 31/03/2016 08:03

But GIraffe a good early years teacher working with young children should be able to fully embrace a play based approach because that's what's best for children at this age, and their early years training will have recognised and supported this. We need different ideas of the sort of skills and approach a teacher is likely to have. I've worked with many good early years teachers who do have this type of skill set, building on the children's interests through play. It shouldn't have to be a teaching from the front whole class approach as might be more appropriate for teaching older children.

JugglingFromHereToThere · 31/03/2016 10:27

I do agree with some PP's though that this suggestion from Save The Children seems a bit disengaged from what's already happening in early years provision. All settings are already guided by the EYFS which I think is a good framework for a play based approach, and there are already good practitioners working in early years, with a variety of qualifications and backgrounds. The good work already being done by both practitioners and parents should be recognised first I think, before we think about how we can build on that for children and families that need more support.

As I mentioned though I think there is room for those who've come into nursery and early years settings from teaching to have their qualifications and experience more fully recognised and appreciated. There needs to be more integration of different pathways people may have taken, with all experience and qualifications recognised in one cohesive framework.

zzzzz · 31/03/2016 10:57

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

JugglingFromHereToThere · 31/03/2016 11:31

I think a key thing here is that it's so widely poorly understood how children can be supported by adults in their play. People think that either children play on their own, or they are taught things - like reading and writing - by people like teachers. Learning through play with the support of adults is at the heart of what needs to be understood for good early years provision. Language development in particular takes place by sharing attention on something of interest with a fluent and sympathetic companion.

One thing that prompted sharing this thought is the picture accompanying the blog post above ... a child reading a book on their own. How much more they would get from the experience if they were sharing the book with an enthusiastic, and skilled, adult.

Lottapianos · 31/03/2016 11:54

Juggling, so true. I'm an Early Years SLT and the vast majority of parents I meet think that their child will learn more from being at nursery (with other 2 and 3 year olds!) than they will being at home with them. There is such a need for parents to be educated about how crucial it is to play, chat, sing and use books with your child from the very beginning. There is still a widespread and worrying belief that learning can only happen in a 'setting' of some sort

corythatwas · 31/03/2016 12:40

Well, Lottapiano, can you blame them when parents are constantly being told by government and school how essential it is that children should spend more time in a school/nursery setting, that holidays/time off in the family home is a waste of time and that any time taken out of school with family will ruin their educational chances forever? And for younger children we are told how essential it is that everybody who looks after them should have special training in Early Years- so probably not mum or dad then. Of course it makes non-specialists (read, parents) feel inadequate, unless they have particularly good self esteem (read, professional MC).

Lottapianos · 31/03/2016 13:03

I said in my first post cory that I object very strongly to the messages sent to parents that they are not expected to parent their own children - hand them over to settings, we'll sort it all out for you. Its such a damaging message for parents and for children. The government's obsession with childcare is totally misguided in my view - money should instead be spent on services like Children's Centres, family support, parenting programs, Speech and Language Therapy, psychotherapeutic support for parents and families etc

Swipe left for the next trending thread