Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Guest posts

Guest post: 'Let's not ignore the business case for a better maternity deal'

18 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 10/03/2015 15:03

Maternity leave gives women the time they need to bond with their babies and recover from pregnancy and childbirth before returning to work. Having this time – at full pay - is deemed essential by many countries, and yet there are parts of the world where there is no statutory requirement for paid maternity leave, or just weeks.

For most organisations, maternity policy is typically a local country decision – each employer makes decisions based on their government policy and culture. This meant that, at Vodafone, women across our subsidiaries were taking varied lengths of maternity leave. Some were taking less than 10 weeks, while others had much longer periods of paid leave and a gentle transition back to work. Some of those who were not getting long leave periods before returning to work eventually left.

We needed to do more to ensure our best female talent stayed with us. Of those women who were leaving Vodafone after maternity leave, most of them were doing so in their first year back to work - something needed to be done to retain them.

The penny dropped: imagine providing a global policy across our 30 subsidiaries, focused on both maternity leave and providing women with a gentle transition back to work. Sixteen weeks at full pay seemed a good minimum standard - it is what the United Nations provides its female employees with across the world – and we wanted to do more to help mothers when they returned, too.

Maternity policies vary widely across our 30 subsidiaries, so we looked carefully at the retention rates of women returning from maternity leave in each country and then compared this with the benefits on offer. There were some clues to be found in Italy, Romania and Portugal, where women received quality time with their newborn babies, and then were also supported on their return to work.

In our business in Italy, where women are able to work shorter days for their first few months back, but at full pay, most were staying in their jobs. So, as well as the 16 weeks minimum leave, we decided to take a similar approach. For six months after their return to work from maternity leave, women will receive full pay for a 30-hour-week - a four day week paid as five. The idea is that this will help them manage their return to work, as well as help with childcare and the cost of it.

While paid maternity leave makes sense for women, it also makes sense for businesses. If women are not supported through the maternity period, they are more likely to leave their jobs. And the hidden costs such as recruitment and training new staff – as well as the knowledge and experience lost when a talented employee leaves – are greater than the cost of providing maternity leave.

Our new scheme will be a short-term investment but, we believe, a medium-term gain. Like all companies, we want to retain talent, as well as encourage good people in to our organisation. At Vodafone, 35% of global employees are women and 21% of senior management are women - good by the measure of many corporates, but still falling short of the gender balance we want to achieve.

We have had gender targets, introduced mentoring and set up women's networks. Focus group work provided some insights – showing that some mid-career women were opting out, as they were finding juggling a family and career too challenging. Then we started to drill in to global maternity data to see if we were missing a trick. We came to the conclusion that providing the right mandatory minimum maternity policy across our global footprint would help.

Everyone thought it was a great idea, but they needed to understand the business benefits. We started to look at the hidden costs of losing women more closely, and found that the costs to rehire and train, plus the loss of experience and skills are not measured in the cost equation – the business case to do more for women did stack up.

We commissioned KPMG to analyse this on a bigger scale, and their insights reinforced our company findings: across the world, if employers paid a minimum of 16 weeks full pay rather than the statutory minimum, savings to global businesses could be up to $19 billion a year. Plus, women worldwide could save up to $14 billion each year on childcare and get to spend around 608 million more days with their babies.

For me, it has been fantastic that the leaders at Vodafone have understood the business benefits of doing the right thing and been prepared to take a bold step to help mothers at our company. We hope others will follow and think about maternity benefits as an investment - and realise that it makes good business sense to have good minimum maternity standards.

OP posts:
PossumPoo · 10/03/2015 17:51

I think that is great. I work for a large international company and seeing what some of my colleagues are and aren't entitled to regarding mat leave makes me a little annoyed.

Purpleflamingos · 10/03/2015 18:17

Well done. Hopefully more companies will look at this and take this practice on board.

Temporaryanonymity · 10/03/2015 19:09

Great, but I'd be happier to read about this in the mainstream business media.

JassyRadlett · 10/03/2015 19:20

Well, I first read about it in the FT and the Washington Post, Temporary - it's had pretty widespread coverage this week.

I think this, and the work that underpins it, is fabulous. To the point where, having been on the bribk of leaving Vodafone over other issues, I'm now reconsidering.

Messygirl · 10/03/2015 19:21

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SquidgyMaltLoaf · 10/03/2015 20:41

Sounds great Smile

Now will somebody please tell this to my boss....

starkadder · 10/03/2015 22:13

Sounds excellent. Do you extend the same sorts of provision to fathers?

It would be easier for women to return to work, in quite a few cases, if it were easier for fathers to do an equal share of the childcare.

Flingingmelon · 10/03/2015 22:17

This is so true but there are just too many backward looking (in my case male) employers who consider you to be useless as soon as you conceive.

ChunkyPickle · 11/03/2015 09:54

I'm with stark - fathers need to have decent paternity too - they also need to bond with their babies, they need to share the burden of childcare from the beginning, and employers need to understand that in order to get the best from mothers, they need to demand that fathers step up and take their leave too.

GoogleyEyes · 11/03/2015 10:06

What Madrigals said.

Mat leave is a good start , but to retain people you need to think about the practicalities of drop and pick up for primary schools (or breakfast / after school clubs, if available) and also about whether your employees (male or female) really want to use childcare and if so, how much.

Rafferty333 · 11/03/2015 11:10

To echo ChunkyPickle & Stark, this is a great step in the right direction, but equality to me means not creating parity for women across geographic boundaries, but creating parity between men and women within boundaries. Sweden provides a fantastic model to look to at no (long term) commercial cost

AnnieLobeseder · 11/03/2015 12:27

It's great news that businesses are starting to look at the bigger picture of the long-term costs of losing/retaining staff over the maternity period instead of short-sightedly trying to get away with doing/paying as little as possible in the short term, and then making it difficult for their female staff to return to work. I hope this type of attitude continues to grow through the business sector.

The next step, IMO, is to not just allow men the same rights as those afforded to women in terms of paternity leave, but to actively encourage it. It's all very well saying that Vodafone wants to increase the number of women in the workforce, but a simple reality is that there will remain a bias on the part of employers, be it concious or unconscious, against hiring women of child-bearing age until it becomes just as likely that men will be taking 6-12 months parental leave when they start a family.

AnnieLobeseder · 11/03/2015 12:28

Oh, and how about Vodafone starts paying some tax while they're at it?

bluelamp · 11/03/2015 19:19

Madrigals, the 3 day week is standard in the UK but not in other countries, I think in France most women work 4 days and in many countries mothers return to full time work. If more fathers went part time after they had children then 2 people working 4 day weeks is equivalent to 1 person working 5 days and the other working 3 days. On the other hand I do agree its slightly prescriptive to say you have to work 4 days but maybe on a worldwide scale it looks good even if it doesn't look so great from a UK perspective.

Messygirl · 11/03/2015 20:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Messygirl · 11/03/2015 20:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AKnickerfulOfMenace · 11/03/2015 20:39

As others have said, what is your paternity leave policy?

BeakyMinder · 14/03/2015 07:16

Massive, unqualified applause from me. Given how horrifically sexist our business culture tends to be ... I'm full of admiration at the individuals at VF that got this policy adopted. Well done.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread