The article says:-
- Make the Rules Clear.
- Make the Consequences for Breaking the Rules Clear.
- Avoid Negotiating Consequences After a Rule is Broken.
- Don't Argue Back.
- Increase the Consequence if Your Child Continues to Argue.
- Be Consistent and Follow Through with Consequences.
- Make Consequences Reasonable and Enforceable.
I mostly agree, but I think the list is too dictatorial. If you just impose rules, some of which you may not have thought fully through, then I think you only set yourself up for a massive rebellion at some point, probably in the mid-teens. (That's me speaking with strong memories in my head of parents who really struggled to understand that I was able to think things through for myself and that some of their rules weren't appropriate by the time I was 16.)
When my children disagree, I tell them I'll listen to their views and if I am wrong then I'll acknowledge it and change the rule. I think its important that they learn to think things through and make wise, and fair, decisions, not just learn to blindly obey my rules. They are only 12 and 13, so its too early to say, but so far it has worked. They see the point of the rules, and they trust me not to be a little Hitler about making up ones just for the power trip. Also, they feel that they get a say and that takes away a lot of the frustration.
They also behave themselves - everyone comments on it - and if they do stray then they get a chance to explain themselves before accepting the punishment.
I do not mean to sound smug. Its just that I am imagining how my mother would've interpreted points 1, 4 and 5. She'd have made up rules, kept them for years, refused to listen to any explanation of why the rule should be amended and then got angry and ramped up the punishments if I had tried to force her to hear me out.