Very good points, chipmonkey.
At the place where I had my Lasik done, the first question they ask, or get you to ask yourself, is "am I happy with my glasses or contacts"? If the answer is yes, then there is no point in going for Lasik - nothing to gain, so nothing to justify the, albeit small, risks.
The other thing that they emphasised was that Lasik did not remove the need for reading glasses. Everyone that dealt with me - optometrists and nurses at the screening and evaluation visits, and the opthamologist right in the theatre - asked if I understood this.
As for scaremongering...the risks of anything severe are very remote, so although it's important to outline these, it is also important to state how rare they are. The risks of dry eye are much higher and it's important that the customer/patient understands that they may be replacing one inconvenience (contact lenses) for another (eye drops).
There has also been a lot of learning since the first laser refractive surgery. The risks nowadays are much lower than the risks 20 years ago, but some of the stories circulating on the web are of people who had their surgery a long time ago who would nowadays not be considered suitable for the surgery, let alone that they did not benefit from the ever-improving technology.
One little anecdote from one of the optometrists I saw - this was in the US 2 years ago, and he said that the UK was much more advanced than the US in their Lasik skill and research. Apparently, Moorfields is held in very high regard there.