Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

General health

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Swine flu vaccine. What's the point if virus mutates?

6 replies

lavenderkate · 26/11/2009 22:45

If the experts are correct and you can catch swine flu a second time as the virus will probably mutate, what is the point in having the vaccine?

Can anyone explain?

OP posts:
rabbitstew · 27/11/2009 10:12

I'm not an expert, or indeed any sort of scientist (!), but I would have thought that you would have some protection from your immunity to the original virus - it's not as if a mutation is a totally new virus, it still has many of the same genetic markers, so your immune system wouldn't totally fail to recognise it. In other words, I suspect you shouldn't get as ill as someone whose body has never seen anything like it before. I'd rather get protection from the original swine flu than get a more nasty mutated form without ever having been acquainted with the original!

MaryMotherOfCheeses · 27/11/2009 10:15

We don't know it will mutate.

Remember 6 months ago they were predicting the whole country would grind to a halt because we would all have swine flu and half the country would die.

I'd have the jab. It will protect you from something which is already in existence.

Bonsoir · 27/11/2009 10:23

Short-term protection. Though of course the vaccine is not 100% effective at all.

I'm not going to bother for my family. We are all basically healthy, have no ENT problems and know to stay in bed in the warm the minute we get ill.

rabbitstew · 27/11/2009 11:20

ps the swine flu virus has already mutated, just not in any way that has any real significance and not in any way that stops the vaccine from being effective against it.

behonest · 26/12/2009 20:56

Don?t all viruses mutate as a natural form of progression or am I just being thick

OhYouMerryMerryKitten · 26/12/2009 22:43

from my very limited understanding some viruses are more stable than others. I think (remembering off hand) that they are either strands of dna or rna. dna viruses are self checking so when they replicate they are fairly accurate copies that survive. rna based viruses don't have a self check so are more unstable. the hiv virus for instance, every copy is a mutated random one. flu is more stable than that but still the copies arent very accurate.
I'm sure its much more complicated than that, but its what I can remember tonight.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread