Hi Schnuller
In a direct answer to your question -- I stopped vaccinating mine because I believed other mothers. I did not automatically dismiss what other parents said had happened to their children as "anecdotal" or "hysterical" or "paranoid". I trust that most mothers know what is happening or has happened to their children, and if thousands say "I vaccinated my child and x happened" then first, I take it on trust, then I read up about it.
So I stalled vaccinations while I read. I looked at the epidemiological studies the government produced to tell us that MMR and vaccines did not cause autism and quite frankly they were shoddy, useless, easily deconstructed, sometimes funded by the pharmaceutical industry and often too obviously designed to produce a particular result. They were retrospective, or dismissed "confounding factors", or ignored salient facts.
Since then I have come to believe that vaccines are probably a significant factor in many more childhood health problems than autism. In allergies, asthma, chronic auto-immune issues such as ME and CFS, and
sudden infant death syndrome.
You can do the maths on herd immunity, and it doesn't work in a vaccinated population.
What does 95pc immunity mean? Does it mean 100pc of people are 95pc immune, or 95 pc of people are 100pc immune. Why should our children bear the brunt of risk when adults are unprepared to do so? Why are the "experts" so convinced that the cause of the auto-immune and austim epidemics is not the vaccination programme, when they don't know what is?
Why are the parents who say this has happened to their children not taken seriously? Why are they smeared and dismissed and threatened with financial ruin? Why are the children themselves not examined when the parents have volunteered this?
There are only questions and none of them has been answered certainly to my satisfaction.
So that's why. For me.