Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

General health

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Was it appropriate to classify 18-year-olds as children in a head lice study?

2 replies

ThisNavyAnt · 05/05/2026 09:42

Would you agree that it was inappropriate for this head lice study (link below) that applied Ovide to the scalps of children to comtrol head lice considered 18-year-olds as children representative of likely prescribed child Ovide use for lice?

https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P10051KW.PDF?Dockey=P10051KW.PDF

OP posts:
ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 05/05/2026 18:28

ThisNavyAnt · 05/05/2026 09:42

Would you agree that it was inappropriate for this head lice study (link below) that applied Ovide to the scalps of children to comtrol head lice considered 18-year-olds as children representative of likely prescribed child Ovide use for lice?

https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P10051KW.PDF?Dockey=P10051KW.PDF

I will not be reading a 202 page study but I would imagine the lice are much the same regardless of the age of the head.

FictionalCharacter · 05/05/2026 18:41

18 year olds aren’t children by definition in the UK, I don’t know about other countries, but they also tested on 9 year olds and 3 year olds so I don’t see much of a problem.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread