DD12 experiences grey outs regularly, edges of her vision go black and she needs to sit down before she faints. She has fully fainted 2 or 3 times.
We did a poor man's tilt test at home which showed spikes from 60bpm at rest to 110bpm after standing but these spikes didn't last for more than 30 seconds. Her heart rate generally trended around 90-95 after standing. She is incredibly tall for her age and hit puberty very early so I'm wondering whether the benchmark should actually be the adult measurements rather than kids?
The GP did a slap dash attempt at a poor man's tilt test in the surgery and buggered it up in my opinion. DD had only just sat down so it wasn't a proper resting measurement and then the doc got distracted talking to me so didn't take the standing measurements at the proper intervals. Just took a couple of readings and that was that. It didn't show much of a sustained spike.
Now I'm doubting myself because DD managed to go on a lot of spinny rides at the fair without too much trouble (although she did very briefly black out on the waltzers, but then that's possible with the G-forces involved I think?)
Here's the part that didn't sit right with me. The GP said something along the lines of "it could be POTS, but really you shouldn't think too much about these things because the symptoms are always worse if you focus on them".
AIBU to think that the GP should come to a decision one way or another about whether it's POTS or not? It doesn't seem right to tell a patient to try and ignore their potential condition because "we can't treat it anyway".
I'm happy to be told it's not POTS but it doesn't seem very professional to mention a condition and then shrug and be indecisive about it.
Are there any POTSies out there who can share their insights?