Quite long and complicated so please bear with me!
Going to doctor later to dicuss a chronic condition. I was diagnosed 15 months ago but a new consultant is now doubting the original diagnosis. I should add this is fairly serious as I have been rendered disabled by it. Fair enough I want a correct diagnosis but new consultant is saying that I present with all the symptoms of original diagnosis and in 5 years time it may be proven that I have this disease but because I don't have the genetic history for it she's not going with that at the moment. Consequently I won't be given the key drugs I had previously been put forward for (I should point out these cost 10k per annum, so that's why I wonder about her motivation for not wanting me to have them) - these drugs would slow and halt deterioration. Without them if I DO have the condition I will end up further disabled. I left consultant's completely confused. She is keeping me under her (rheumatology) despite saying she doesn't think it's rheumatic - so I don't understand why I'm not being referred back to orthopedics (where I started two years ago). She's precribed different anti-rheumatic drugs - why, if it's not rheumatic? She said she was prescribing me 7.5mg of one drug but the actual prescription turned out to be 10 micrograms so I haven't taken it yet but have run out of my original 5 micrograms. I don't have confidence in her, especially given she made a simple mistake over a prescription, so what about the diagnosis? I'm going to the GP to discuss it because I don't know where else to turn - but should I just put up and shut up and jump through the hoops she wants me to? But if the original diagnosis is correct and I lose more time then more damage will happen and I could end up wheelchair bound. I'm so wound up and frustrated that I feel like I'm back at the beginning. Can the GP do anything? I'm worried I'm going to burst in to tears on him because I'm so frustrated by the whole thing.