ds1 (4.9) has had what we think was balanitis once before - he had antibiotics and it was fine. (Just the end of his 'wuwee' was a bit red and sore)
He was complaining it was sore again at the weekend so I took him to Dr on Monday, she said it was prob the same thing and gave us an ointment to use - she said it was often caused by bubblebath, which we only just started using really, so I said we'll stop.
Anyway he was still sore yesterday and I thought it was a urine infection, however we've seen a different doctor and he said there's nothing odd in Ds's wee, that shows up now anyway (we're going to send some off in case) but he could refer us to a specialist if I wanted, as there was a note saying 'watch for possible tight foreskin' or something? and he had a look at Ds's and said it was a bit tight (I don't think so, it seems fine to me - I think he thought the other Dr thought so)
Anyway I said I was reluctant to circumcise and he said there was no point seeing the consultant then, as that's all he would do.
I was a bit {shocked] at the general attitude that Ds's foreskin is dispensable with, without a lot more investigation/attempts to establish what the actual problem is first.
I would see it as a total last resort and only if he was going to be in recurring pain or disabled by it not being done iyswim.
Two episodes of balanitis within a yer doesn't say 'cut it off' to me. Am I being sensible here?