pfffffff! typed a long post and now gone!
Our DS was circumcised as a baby by religious tradition.
I don't see the rationale of doing it "just in case" referring to medical hypotheticals.
I'm even more at DSS 17 years old ( is he willing?) "having the chop" because he is now sexually active!!!!
I'm not saying religious motive good others bad. Just that we knew AND AGREED from the outset that we'd do it. We have witnessed it first hand with many jewish and muslim friends and family. It's perfectly fine when done on small babies by skilled practitioner. Heals well as kutilputil described.
I would suggest a serious discussion with DP about his motives. Maybe he needs to be reminded that the decision is not his alone and that he's got to have valid reasons. I also think that when a toddler can walk and talk ( actually as soon as they move about and communicate even non verbally and that is very early - a few months) they should be asked.
Our Ds had it at 15 months. Way too old. We delayed it because various family dramas came in the way ( car crash - coma - trauma of hospitals).
Anyway, DS now 4 remembers.
Here's the story to meditate:
I'm pg and we all went for a scan to meet baby. When in hospital, he saw the white coats and kept quiet. Later that day he complained of nappy rash.
I said don't be silly you don't have one. He replied yes but remember yesterday when we went to hospital and I had a nappy rash and you put cream on my willy to make it better?
I said you were a baby how can you remember? he said very matter of factly :I was not a baby-baby, I was a talking baby!
That was a complete shock! we did a lot of cuddling and explaining afterwards and never talked about it since.