Statistically, you're probably more likely to reduce your chances of dying from breast cancer by maintaining a healthy bodyweight, exercising regularly and minimising your alcohol intake than you are by attending screening every 5 years over age 50.
Are all the staunch advocates of screening also doing those things?
There was a really good book published a few years ago by Dr Phil Hammond which acts as a patient's guide to navigating and understanding the NHS:
Staying Alive: How to Get the Best From the NHS
www.amazon.co.uk/Staying-Alive-How-Get-Best-ebook/dp/B00HVBJZS4
The section on screening is available to read in the free download section and he explains very clearly the risk/ reward dilemma.
Basically healthcare often boils down to political and commercial factors. Breast screening evangelism has become so entrenched in the UK it's difficult to challenge. All sorts of organisations have a vested interest in funnelling women through the screening pipeline:
- GPs, who get paid per patient referred
- Consultants, who get paid to treat
- Charities, who employ thousands of employees and volunteers to keep promoting the message 'breast screening saves lives' (it may not...)
- private healthcare companies who benefit from health anxiety and fast tracking worried patients for (perhaps unnecessary?) treatment
And the NHS is still fundamentally a patriarchal organisation. If, for every 1 woman who receives treatment which might be useful, 3 others get invasive, anxiety-giving, life-changing unnecessary treatment, then so what? Women's concerns are dismissed. It's only now women are stepping forward to explain the impact of possible overdiagnosis and treatment:
www.theguardian.com/society/2022/jun/09/overdiagnosis-some-breast-cancer-treatments-may-have-been-unnecessary-study-suggests
Every woman needs to make her own decision, based on thorough research and evaluation of her own risk profile and shouldn't feel bullied into having screening if they are unsure.