5G - serious health issue esp for babies and children

[sallybeare]

Hi. I'm trying to raise awareness here about 5G. The government is pushing this untested technology on us and citing out-of-date, inadequate assurances from Public Health England which are based on commercial guidelines. The consensus from international scientists and professors of biochemistry and radiation is that 5G (as well as mobile radiation generally) has been overwhelmingly proven in thousands of peer-reviewed studies to be a biohazard, especially to children and babies who absorb this type of non-ionising radiation much more readily than adults. Please see Dr Erica Mallory-Blythe's website PHIRE and its 5G leaflet for evidence-based information and start informing others in your area, as well as keeping an eye out for local fb campaigns. Thanks.

www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/21/mobile-phones-are-not-a-health-hazard

This link is the riposte to the article that Chewing Pencils linked to

www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/21/mobile-phones-are-not-a-health-hazard

^Last week the Observer published an article by Mark Hertsgaard and Mark Dowie on a disturbing topic – the idea that telecoms giants might collude to suppress evidence that wireless technology causes cancer. The feature was well written, ostensibly well researched, and deeply concerning. Its powerful narrative tapped into rich themes; our deep-seated fears about cancer, corporate greed, and technology’s potentially noxious influence on our health. It spread rapidly across social media – facilitated by the very object on which it cast doubt.

2017's top business stories: Whole Foods, hackers and a giant rabbit
Read more
Yet as enthralling as Hertsgaard and Dowie’s narrative might be, it is strewn with rudimentary errors and dubious inferences. As a physicist working in cancer research, I found the authors’ penchant for amplifying claims far beyond that which the evidence allows troubling. And as a scientist deeply invested in public understanding of science, I’ve seen first-hand the damage that scaremongering can do to societal health. While it is tempting to rage into the void, perhaps this episode can serve as a case study in how public understanding of science can be mangled, and what warning signs we might look out for.^

Ok. Well he seems very certain. Usually scientists are a bit more circumspect, but happy to cross it off the list of things to be concerned about.

Search for Mark Steele on YouTube. He's a weapons expert and he knows all about 5G.

I don't know how to do the link but this is well worth listening to:

Is very serious stuff and should be stopped.

Sorry!

This is the clip I meant to post:

Just bumping this thread with today's Guardian:

www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jul/28/rollout-of-5g-and-the-risk-of-harm

Hmmm a letter by the person who started this thread. I’m convinced!

@Shantotto, I'm not sure either. But it's not just her - both letters seem worth reading at least.

Anyone saying there’s no evidence, including the brain scientist, have obviously haven’t researched it outside of biased (bbc/government) websites, how very ignorant and dangerous. As a brain scientist and someone asserting some authority on the subject, this is extremely dangerous and extremely narrow minded. We live under Emley Moor Mast, it’s terrifying to know that it is/will be pouring 5g across our area, I apologise but I think I will take the word of 180 doctors and scientists across the world who have signed the paper saying we are already exposed to unsafe amounts of EMF , pre 5g!! These scientists have all listed their names and countries.

ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Scientist-5G-appeal-2017.pdf

The ones saying it’s nonsense, remember these conversations in 5yrs/10yrs time and remember how you ridiculed people trying to warn you, disgusting behaviour by women/“scientists/mothers

I am concerned about this. When you look at the evidence even on 4G, there are some worrying papers. And as fat as I can see, the research hasn’t been properly done in 5G.

As you say, there is no escaping 5G. We are the test subjects.

I have realised no one cares, however. If they are told it’s “safe”, they aren’t interested. I have given up

Note the guardian quotes “mobile phone use” is not linked to cancer, not EMF exposure!!!! Please don’t be happy to cross it off your list of concerns, dig deeper, in this world we can no longer just accept what we are fed, wake up ladies, your children are at grave risk

DH is a physicist working in radiation research. His phone is never more than six inches away, and he has no concerns about DD and that aspect of mobile devices (as opposed to screen time etc).

I think 5G is going to use the part of the spectrum freed up by turning off analogue TV. Did you panic over your TV aerial in days gone by?

Mindystclaire does he share concerns mention above by the 180 professionals worried about EMF exposure, don’t confuse mobiles being deemed safe and EMF being deemed safe, a play on words is well played card?

Sorry I feel like I’m over posting but just a thought, if 4g is pretty instant and already a worry why risk 5g, does this not set alarm bells ringing!!?

Not something we discuss often B4dBunny - but I know the local posters about 5G anger or amuse him depending on the day.

I also have a physics degree and have no concerns, although I don't think an undergrad degree more than a decade ago qualifies me as an expert in any way.

Mindystclaire another 26,000 scientists have added their names to the list strongly opposing 5g, I don’t mean t b rude but maybe u n ur husband should dig a little deeper, it is coming to light that many things in our world are not as they may first appear

Userundone no way, I just watched that video, it’s all much worse than I even thought, this is such a scary place for us, I can’t believe people are justifying it, and defending it, breaks my heart,

@sallybeare thank you for raising this issue. I am convinced 5G is dangerous and would like to know if there is a proven method of protection against it. There are a lot of products on Amazon (anti EMF stickers etc. ), can anyone help please? TIA

Personally, I think an important piece of information here is that Brussels and Geneva - home to some of the most powerful, wealthy and influential people (and their families) - have both blocked roll-out of 5G. You know, just till it's been trialled on... the rest of us?

Thanks Sally for speaking out on this crime against humanity. I am just back from a peaceful protest I helped organise in my town where they are rolling this out despite the publics opposition and the overwhelming science that shows clear evidence of harm.

Why are people trusting lobby groups to set their own safety guidelines and that ignore the research proving direct links to no end of disease and illness?

Main stream media receive around 50% of their incomes from lobby groups such as the telecoms and big Pharma. Of course they will say it's safe. The BBC are complicit to the criminal harm that is caused to children. Children and pregnant women should be kept away from wireless devices. I cannot emphasise this enough. Look out for the work or Emeritus professor, Dr Martin Pall. Dr Devra Davis also talks a lot about why children should never have wireless devices or be around wireless tech. Most homes now are so loaded with wireless stuff that the cumulative levels are extremely high and dangerous.

Take time to watch this lecture and learn from an expert on the dangers surrounding us and our children. Note how long ago they realised there was a problem and yet Politicians are ignoring it.

Only your protests can stop this harmful 5G network.

eng.unimelb.edu.au/engage-with-us/lectures/davis-2015

The Govts have been infiltrated with coercive measures to ignore the peril of a Technology that has so much money involved that the Truth is ignored.
Greed and Deceit has bought off peoples consciousness. The convenience of the Technology has blinded common sense in recognising the cause of illness, as the symptom`s alone are treated without any investigation into the cause.
Its the same as the Covid injections. Identical.