My personal view is that this is a ridiculous vaccination.
Do some number crunching with the statistics from Cancer Research UK. The odds of someone under 70 getting cervical cancer are incredibly low. The numbers involved are tiny and the death rate is falling on its own (without any vaccine). That's probably partly to do with screening and maybe also to do with different lifestyle factors.
If my maths is right, using the information supplied by Cancer Research, the number of deaths in the under 35 age group is 0.16 per 100,000.
Just to put the statistics in perspective, deaths on the roads in the UK are 5.6 per 100,000 (stats from 2004).
The death rate from cervical cancer of just over 1,000 people per year in the UK is heavily skewed by the (already very small numbers) of deaths in the over 70 age group (take a look at the graph.) Why give a jab to a child for an extremely uncommon disease that predominantly strikes the over 70s (like most cancers and many other diseases)?
Furthermore, cervical cancer is strongly associated with lifestyle factors, so it is possible to reduce the (already very small risk) by taking simple preventative measures, which will also protect against a host of other nasty sexually transmitted diseases. Prevention is the best policy so education about sexual health is important.
I don't know what risks are associated with the vaccine, but by definition there must be some.
For my money, this vaccine makes no sense. My daughers will not be having it.
Cancer Research UK : UK Cervical Cancer mortality statistics