Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
General health

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Original poster

Those who work full-time - would you be happy to pay £20 to see your doctor out of hours?

77 replies

CountessDracula · 04/06/2007 20:08

Read in the paper tonight that there is a proposal to make GP services available in the evenings for a charge of say £20

Personally I would be happy to pay for this to avoid taking time off work, what do you feel?

OP posts:
poptot · 04/06/2007 20:09

I would happily pay for this.

Kathyis6incheshigh · 04/06/2007 20:10

I would, but I was a bit cross about the assumption in the article I read that if you are working you can afford £20 easily. Lots of people can't.

morocco · 04/06/2007 20:10

no not really, I mean, yes we could pay but I don't see why we should have to - I'd rather gp's contracts were changed so it was expected that they be open out of hours.

loobylooby · 04/06/2007 20:10

no - they already get paid too much for the service they provide - or don't in many cases.

SenoraPostrophe · 04/06/2007 20:11

I'd be happy to pay £20 as long as i didn't have to wait more than, say 20 minutes.

I certainly think it's fairer than making all docs work evenings (and paying good NHS money for the priveledge)

lisad123 · 04/06/2007 20:13

I wouldnt do it. Work have to give you time off to attend health appointments so I always book mine in work time
Lisa

Original poster
CountessDracula · 04/06/2007 20:13

I am self employed!

OP posts:
SenoraPostrophe · 04/06/2007 20:13

do they? I thought that was only antenatal appts?

Tutter · 04/06/2007 20:14

i know dh would, if that helps

if it was a long appt, then so would i, even though i'm a sahm (in order to be able to go without ds)

Original poster
CountessDracula · 04/06/2007 20:16

I do feel that those who don't want to pay can still go in the daytime and that this would be a welcome addition to the services they provide

OP posts:
morocco · 04/06/2007 20:21

thin edge of the wedge though, cd, next it'll be 'how about paying for small ops or for faster service etc etc'. I don't see any problem for doctors working a rota (ok,maybe cos I'm not a doctor!) and having to do some evening/weekend work, loads of people have to nowadays and get paid a lot less for it as well

roisin · 04/06/2007 20:22

Yes, I would pay.
And I think they should charge people who don't turn up for appointments too.

PanicPants · 04/06/2007 20:23

No, I wouldn't. Just because I'm working doesn't mean I can afford £20 to pay to see the dr, when everyone else could see them for free.

Something else to make working parents life harder.

Original poster
CountessDracula · 04/06/2007 20:23

Not just working parents, surely all workers

OP posts:
Original poster
CountessDracula · 04/06/2007 20:23

it would make mine easier!

OP posts:
cazzybabs · 04/06/2007 20:24

No - i'd take time off or expect work to pay.

Rubyslippers · 04/06/2007 20:26

would make my life easier but i would be very unwilling to pay £20 for it. If you factor in potential prescription costs (say one item) that is another (nearly) £7 - so the best part of £30 for something you should be able to access for free anyway!

Otter · 04/06/2007 20:26

we charge much more than 20 to be called out - but we do run our vets till 6.30-7.00 every night and on sat mornings every saturday morning

beckybrastraps · 04/06/2007 20:26

But where would the GPs come from though? I mean, didn't most of them opt out of providing out of hours cover when the new contracts were brought in. They don't want the extra money. I bet you wouldn't get your actual GP. You'd get some locum or stand in. Like a walk-in clinic. And you can go to them now.

Original poster
CountessDracula · 04/06/2007 20:26

Fine if you are employed

I am self employed and it would cost me a hell of a lot more than £20 to wait until 9 to see the Dr, usually delayed by 20 mins minimum and then have to travel to work, virtually half a day taken out

OP posts:
dyzzidi · 04/06/2007 20:26

I would be happy to pay for an non urgent appointment. They already do NHS walk in centres which are fantastic when dd is ill etc. I don't think the NHS should be a 24 hour thing for non urgent appointments.

If the don't do the charging thing I have to book time off work to see GP.

If you can't afford the £20 then surely you are in the same position as now. Non urgent 9 - 5 urgent walk in centre.

Original poster
CountessDracula · 04/06/2007 20:27

you would of course still be able to access it free if you wanted to go during the day!

OP posts:
UCM · 04/06/2007 20:29

To be honest my first feeling on this is if I am working full time and paying shedloads of money into a coffer then quite reasonably I should be able to see a Dr. whenever. If I had something so serious that I needed to see the Doctor out of hours, I would go to A&E. But as someone else said, I would book the appt. in work time anyway because I can

UCM · 04/06/2007 20:30

Should have added that, No I don't expect to pay for something that I am already paying for.

bookthief · 04/06/2007 20:31

I don't really understand why gp surgeries/ outpatient clinics keep so-called "office hours". It's not usual for doctors to only work these hours elsewhere in the health service.

Presumably it's a staffing issue, and also because they can. How would paying £20 per appointment really cover the cost of such a service? If they can supply cover at times that suit modern working practices better then imo they should.

Wouldn't affect most people I know who tend to be on at least 6 day rotas anyway.

Swipe left for the next trending thread