Wow, you are an angry little bunny, aren't you? Changing name and all, just to put us ignoramuses in our place.
So let me get this right: Your friend knows everything, our gynecologists know nothing. Or they are liars. Or we are idiots who can't remember what we've been told. Hmmm...
Let's see...
"Hormones have EVERYTHING to do with the morphology of cells. Otherwise why would our body send them out if they don't affect anything?"
That is a nonsensical statement. Hormones are useful for other things. Not for mutating our cells in a cancerous way.
"...the zone affected is not called 'transition' but 'transformation' zone."
In French it's called "la zone de transformation". I go to a gyne in France and had my operation in a French hospital. I speak French with my gynecologist. Writing here, I translated it to "transformation zone", which it turns out is not the terminology in UK. So shoot me.
"There is no such grade as 'inconclusive' but 'inadequate'"
Wrong again. Google to see a description of what an "inconclusive" smear result is. Or if you are feeling lazy, click here .
"Another 'rule' is that it takes 10 years from being 'infected' with HPV to get any changes"
'Any changes', as in going from clean smear to CIN I? That first step is supposed to take 10 years??? That is ridiculous, given that it is recommended to start smear tests three years after first intercourse, and then repeat them every couple of years, not once a decade. Everybody I know who had dysplasia went from clean smear test to CIN II or CIN III in 3-4 years. I personally went from clean to CIN III in less than 3 years.
Baby woke up, can't continue with the rest of your statements, although it has been a pleasure. We can continue later, if you wish. That would be especially nice if you develop a spine in the meanwhile and assume your original name. I suspect you will be more pleasant to talk to in your original persona.