Interesting article at first glance, he certainly writes persuasively. Then I clicked on the about us link. Literal tree huggers, with obscure alphabets after their names and a very good line in promoting themselves and their rather vague organisation on very little evidence of robust scientific investigation or understanding.
I think he ignores the fact that the USA is a litigious society, those leaflets will have been checked and re checked word for word, but not by doctors, by lawyers.
If cervical cancer , herpes and other STDs turn out to be curable and avoidable by dint of good nutrition then I will apologise in person. Until then I would avoid this snake oil salesman like a rattlesnake. Any one who thinks a sweeping statement like "more girls have been killed by this vaccine than by the cancer" is evidence of rigorous scientific expertise is sadly deluded.
I do think debate about the vaccine is a good thing, debate about all illness is a good thing, but it needs to be informed , accurate and based on proper scientific research otherwise we are back in MMR territory.
People with axes to grind are not usually very concerned about which trees they cut down while proving how sharp their axes are.