I don't really want to get into the MMR debate. My youngest will be due to have it in the next few months and we will definitely go ahead with it, but I wouldn't want to be the one to suggest what anyone else should or shouldn't do.
I am writing, actually, in response to jenny2998, about the book she mentioned - And Educated Decision. I have read this book too and don't believe anyone could read that book and not see a lot more than just an element of persuasion. She is very obviously trying to put people off the MMR.
Not only that, an awful lot of what she has to say is complete nonsense. Not only from the point of view of homeopathy (which I wholeheartedly support!), but even some of the basic biology she describes is just wrong. I actually think it is a very dangerous book.
There is a lot of very good information out there on both sides of the MMR argument, but I wouldn't recommend this particular book to anyone!
Personally, i have downloaded tons of stuff from the internet - from government web sites, from the NHS, from the American Academy of Pediatrics. I even found the original Lancet article by Andrew Wakefield - not someone else's summary, but the original research. While there is some compelling and worrying information, it is based on a study of only 8 children.
Anyway, like I said, I'm not trying to convince anyone one way or the other, just passing on a warning to be a bit careful about what you read. It's a hard enough decision for all of us I think!