CAn anyone give me a bit of advice on what to say when someone - who clearly has mental health issues as well - thinks their fibromyalgia is a muscular pain syndrome that should only be treated by a rheumatologist?
I've had fibromyalgia (or something similar) in two episodes, 2002-8 and 2011-2013. At the time my father wrote me off as being a lazy malingerer with nothing wrong with me other than being an academic failure. My father doesn't really do sympathy, empathy or any form of engagement with anything other than 1950s "it's all in your body and otherwise you're a loony or a lying malingerer" type medicine.
Now his GP is suggesting fibromyalgia as an explanation for his (my father's) muscle aches. Father of course is aggressively asking for appointments with rheumatologists, monoclonal antibody drugs, and telling the GP that any other description of the aetiology of fm is utter bollocks - so will not be seen by gastroenterologists, pain doctors, CBT therapists, psychotherapists, physiotherapists, etc - despite having very clear, present issues with both gastro stuff (has had what's looked like IBS for decades) and mental health and coping style (depression, feelings of resentment and rejection and aggression, over the fact i've got pregnant and thus my primary concern in future will not be sorting out my father's babyish/aggressive complete-absence-of-coping style), and saying that exercise makes him feel better (but he wouldn't do it if someone other than a "proper doctor" told him to).
I sound unsymapthetic. i'm not - I do know what this feels like, but - having engaged myself with fm as a complex syndrome of varying and in many cases unknown aetiology - I am a bit fed up with my father's arrogance, aggression and insistence that he knows everything about something like fm, when a few years ago he denied it even existed, and now he clearly doesn't know a lot about it.
Thus - is there anything i can say that might make him engage with a broader picture than rheumatologists and monoclonal antibodies?
For reference - he's a scientist in a different field (as am I) - so generally he refuses to engage with what he describes as pseudoscience - and what I might describe as "science that has been invented since he was at university in the 1950s"....