I'm really interested in a GP's view on these matters.
I was diagnosed a few years back as borderline, and with retesting hypo. I came across the various patient lobby groups which I dismissed initially as pseudoscience and woo, and I still think much of it is.
But I'd be really interested to hear of your clinical view about the edges and boundaries of the science, and how that interacts with the economics of clinical practice in the NHS.
Of course, many other things cause hypothyroid-like symptoms as you say, particularly in middle aged women. But there are real differences in clinical practice globally. Why is it that US endocrinology recommends a much lower TSH range than the UK? Is it because of real differences in the science, or more about the impact of private healthcare on triggering intervention?
If it is the latter, it might be quite reasonable for the NHS to have a higher tolerance of borderline TSH levels, as an institution.
But those of us who are treated but don't feel completely well might take a different view.
New NHS policy is asking us to take personal responsibility for our health, precisely so we DON'T darken your very busy doorsteps with pointless demands.
I am quite happy to do that, but it is hard in the NHS to get personalised healthcare in this way, and outside the NHS is full of charlatans, muggers and woo merchants. It is precisely BECAUSE some of us trust you and respect your training that we want to have these conversations.
For me, for example, I have a whole raft of subtle "middle aged menopausal woman" symptoms, some of which might be an under treated or clunkily treated thyroid, or they might not. I am looking down the barrel of heart disease and diabetes if I don't get on top of my weight and mental health issues. Are these thyroid related? I don't know, but my TSH certainly goes right back up if I miss treatment and it has progressively declined.
I am also quite prepared to accept that the continued other things might not
Be thyroid related, after all, lots of people do have the same stuff. But when I look at it overall (life history of digestive issues, weight loss and gain without really trying, anxiety/phobia/depression, heart murmur and palpitations, food intolerances, and more recently, forgetfulness, hair and eyebrow thinning, dry itchy skin, cold and, it turns out, a bit of a family history...) then I begin to see a pattern. I have another 20 years of hard intellectual work before I can take my pension, and my youngest child is 7. I really can't afford NOT to take responsibility for it. I want to rule out all possible treatable things.
Personal health care responsibility should be about patients knowing themselves well. We are not clinicians, but we're not stupid or passive either. I read quite a lot of clinical literature and try to decipher it but of course, I really need a GP who isn't too rushed, who can be a partner to me in working it all out.
People like want me to try and optimise our health, and sometimes what seems like an odd and subtle syndrome of things seems to connect together. I was completely shocked to find that my plantar fasciitis and chronic bladder infections are common in hypo people. What to make of this? Just the confounding variable of being a middle aged woman? Maybe.
But when I read one of the woo sites about supplementing with magnesium, my PF improved dramatically and my mental health improved dramatically. When I took high dose long term antibiotics and found my chronic infections previously diagnosed as the made up condition "interstitial cystitis" subsided, against current NICE guidelines, and in the process found many other "IC" patients who also had concurrent autoimmune problems, what to make of this?
Placebo? Again, I am prepared to accept that possibility. But in the absence of good science taking such a personalised and holistic approach, and crucially, doing the good science on it, what are we supposed to do, except sift through the bad science ourselves?