Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

General health

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

To cancel my holiday due to Ebola epidemic

89 replies

salonebabe · 19/07/2014 20:40

I'm going to Sierra Leone in a few weeks time, but I'm getting extremely anxious about the Ebola epidemic (www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2014/jul/17/ebola-sierra-leone-epidemic).

The Foreign & Commonwealth Office advice is still that there is minimal risk to tourists. Maybe I am worrying needlessly, but I suspect the problem is far worse than the official WHO figures are suggesting. I also don't think the FCO appreciate the realities of travel within Sierra Leone - jam packed buses, ferries and taxis etc. Unless the FCO issue a 'don't travel' advisory, I'll be unable to cancel and claim on my travel insurance.

I've been looking forward to this trip for a long time, so really don't want to cancel. I also can't afford to lose the money already spent on flights and accommodation.

Are there any medical experts here who could help me decide whether I should cancel or not? I appreciate that I, like most people, am not very good at assessing risk objectively, and I don't feel that I have enough information to make an informed decision. If a doctor on these forums was to say that they would have no problem travelling, or the converse, then that would help me make my decision.

OP posts:
vrtra · 20/07/2014 00:36

Wash your hands a lot (not sure what good antibacterial gel would be vs a virus), stay away from caves and animals and corpses. Don't eat monkey, bat/rodent or pig meat. It's not airborne and people get sick very quickly so are unlikely to be walking around spreading it. Many cases are caused by the bathing of victims' bodies.

honeycrest · 20/07/2014 01:31

Ebola isn't airborne is it? You can only get it by coming into direct contact with an infected persons bodily fluids which isn't very likely really. I'm sure that, unless you are going to an area which is badly affected, then the chances of you catching it are slim. I still wouldn't go though but to be honest I wouldnt go there anyway, outbreak or not.

missingmumxox · 20/07/2014 01:53

I work in travel health as well as OH nursing as lots of companies send staff away on business.

I don't know where you are going, but on a purely reactive response, i would say go back to whoever you went to originally for your travel vaccinations ... You have done that haven't you? because there is a fuck of a lot more shit to be worried about as well there, and get up to date advice.

MonstersBalls · 20/07/2014 01:53

I'd risk it if it was just me, visiting family, because I'd take/use precautions, but I wouldn't take dc if you have them.

missingmumxox · 20/07/2014 01:56

I mean in seri leone, not in the world.
Makes a difference on the region on the travel advice you would give.

missingmumxox · 20/07/2014 02:01

Ironically Balls, it is people who visit family abroad who are most at risk of illness, as they think they are immune, having lived there.
So fail to visit GP to have travel vacs, obviously in this case vacs will not help but ...

Wishfulmakeupping · 20/07/2014 03:02

I wouldn't go- sorry OP don't think I would risk it

marcopront · 20/07/2014 06:03

I think it depends on where you are going and why?

Are you visiting family/friends and staying in a rural location?

Trazzletoes · 20/07/2014 06:39

I'd go. I think the FCO probably have a reasonable idea what Sierra Leone is like. They have to err on the side of caution so if they say it's safe enough, I'd go.

The OP won't be the first person to come (back) to the UK from those 3 countries since the outbreak started.

Take basic precautions, avoid personal contact with sick people ( I think it's not contagious until people are symptomatic?) and have an amazing time!

dontcallmemam · 20/07/2014 07:13

Nathnac (linked earlier) suggest risks are low for tourists. If to was a destination I wanted to visit, I'd go
www.nathnac.org/pro/clinical_updates/ebola_westafrica_030714.htm

NotQuiteCockney · 20/07/2014 08:14

Ebola is generally transmitted by very personal contact. Someone catches it off a fruit bat. And then it spreads by:

  1. A medic uses one needle on lots and lots of people. One of those people has ebola already.
  1. Someone dies of ebola. As is traditional, their relatives prepare their body personally for burial. So their relatives have close physical contact (no gloves) with a great deal of blood. Some of them sicken and die. Their relatives ...
salonebabe · 20/07/2014 08:56

Thanks for all the replies so far. As expected, the mixture of responses are mirroring the thoughts going through my mind. I'm still not sure what to do, but I'll take the advice of a previous poster and phone the British Embassy in Freetown on Monday. I'll also pretend to be American, and try the American Embassy as well, since I have a feeling that I'm more likely to get an honest response from them.

Why Sierra Leone? Well I am originally from there and don't get to visit friends/family that often. It is also a beautiful country to visit - just do a Google for Sierra Leone beaches (www.google.co.uk/search?q=sierra+leone+beaches&tbm=isch).

OP posts:
oohdaddypig · 20/07/2014 09:03

Why on earth would a doctor posting on mumsnet make you feel better? Most will have very little experience of the relative risks of contracting Ebola in Sierra Leone!

Make the decision by speaking to the right people eg the embassy or the London hospital for tropical disease.

What is your attitude to risk? Where are you staying? Do you have close friends there?

Personally, there is way more than Ebola that I would worry about if I visited Sierra Leone, if i based my decision solely on statistics.

mismylinford · 20/07/2014 09:16

ebola is a hemogragic fever which can only be passed by direct contact with infected sweat blood urine or feces.
the effected areas are remote without knowing your holiday plans i can't say if your likely to come into.contact with an infect human.
as long as you don't go rubbing yourself on the locals you should be ok.
personally i think its insane that you would want to go in the first place, but im a health freak

UncleT · 20/07/2014 10:51

You're not going to get ebola - the advice out there is consistent from a wide range of sources, that the risk is tiny. Of course, if you're scared for other reasons then that's another matter, but don't cancel because of ebola.

Flipflops7 · 20/07/2014 12:22

That Guardian article would definitely put me off.

Birdsgottafly · 20/07/2014 12:32

Surely you would be more at risk than just a tourist would be, if you are visiting family.

You would be hugging people, they would be introducing you to people, which could mean more hugging, hand shakes, offers of food/drink etc.

I would like the tradition of handshakes to die out, stand in any toilet and even the "poshest/groomed" people don't wash their hands.

I wouldn't want to hover over a toilet for the duration of a two week holiday, even the doors etc won't be free of urine.

Look at the swab test results done randomly on TV program's.

I agree that on a matter like this, the Embassy/school of Tropical Medichine is the only advice to take.

queenofthemountain · 20/07/2014 12:34

I would go.The risk is tiny, your more likelt to get knocked over in traffic

marcopront · 20/07/2014 12:41

What do family and friends there say? They have a better idea of the risk where you will be, and also presumably don't want you to get ill.

FairPhyllis · 20/07/2014 13:06

In your place I would probably go, after checking with the Embassy and family and friends what the situation is exactly where you are going. Ebola is actually relatively difficult to transmit: it's not airborne, it can be relatively easily contained, and the pathogen can be killed with soap and bleach.

As long as you do not eat bushmeat, are not nursing an Ebola patient and are not working in a clinical setting your risk is minimal. And take the normal precautions you would against HIV/AIDS transmission.

In contrast, if there were a flu outbreak in the region you were going to, I would say stay away: it's much more dangerous.

beijaflor · 20/07/2014 13:41

The UK high commission will be honest with you. If they have not evacuated non-essential personnel, then that means that the children of UK staff will still be living in Sierra Leone. If they thought there was a serious risk, they would tell you.

All the evidence looked at so far suggests that you should go and enjoy yourself, depending upon your exact destination and what you intend to do.

marcopront · 20/07/2014 14:15

Just had a thought. What passport do you have? Are you a dual national? If there was to be an evacuation of UK citizens then as a dual national you would have no rights, or at least that is my understanding but the guidance is unclear.
My DD is a dual national and I have just taken her to her father's country where the FCO advice against travel to some parts and I tried to find out what would happen if there was an evacuation and couldn't.

Downamongtherednecks · 20/07/2014 17:40

Not to state the obvious, but I am assuming you have already bought a medical kit with saline, sharps, suture kits etc? (Also, - top tip - I have superglue in mine, so you can fix quite deep cuts yourself without having to go to hospital where the infection risks are scarily high). I would go, but be vigilant, not just sensible.

dontcallmemam · 20/07/2014 17:43

and , of course, Malaria is a big risk.

Swipe left for the next trending thread