i'll PM you. Queens is where I am looking at. The care bothers me, but, realistically, as long as I am out in a couple of days and the surgeon is excellent I will suck that up. Were you happy with the surgical side of things, I know you had issues with the speed of dealing with it didn't you? Was that surgical? I hope it's not 'that one' of Matilda's, and you are instead referring to the 'fixer' 
Good to hear about the pain clinic, maybe I won't go down that route then, I can have useless without travelling hundreds of miles
but, i really like the notion that there can be more exploratory stuff to see what else might be happening instead of this 'you have something that can be fixed surgically, or else it's a malfunction which we can't fix' catchall I keep facing. If that is what is happening, then I will deal with it just fine, but, they cannot possibly say that while there is still going on that is visible on the MRI and not thoroughly researching that first.
Like, the pain clinic consultant showed me an MRI image where the nerves were close to the disc bulge but not touching and said 'you are lying nice and flat and see how the nerves are lovely and relaxed not touching the disc' or something like that, but, that's the problem with the MRI, it's not a standing MRI, and I am in the position that is the least painful which suggests the pressure is not there when I am that position, but when I sit, or stand, or bend. So they need to do a standing MRI and I would expect there would be a somewhat different result. Or some movement based x-ray that the consultant can be there for, to observe the movements as I move. Or a dye contrast to check the nerves properly, all sorts of things.
I have figured out what happened with pain clinic. The GP referred me back to neurosurgery for second opinion, the central referral unit (serco or some other idiotic cheap as chips outsourced company) messed it up by sending it straight back to local hospital (i'll you you that story later) for the neuro team to discuss my case in a weekly 'multidisciplinary team meeting'. Which, of course, includes the pain clinic! So! That explains why the consultant kept going on and on about surgery and accepting it won't happen, despite this being a pain management meeting not a neurosurgery one, and how Mr Arrogant would not make this decision if it was not the right one, wheeled out all the stats and tried his hardest to convince me that Mr Arrogant was making the right call (and he kept using his name, his full name not Mr Arrogant, but 'Rupert Arrogant' Because ! they discussed me at the weekly multidisciplinary meeting! And Mr Arrogant likely said something along the lines of 'i see you are dealing with Mrs Wontgoaway, I have written to tell her, I have seen her to tell her, and she keeps coming back! Have a work with her will you Mr Pain Man?' Brilliant, over to you, my job's done, so, whose next on the list?. And probably has not even looked at my newest MRI and x-ray, as that re-referral has pissed him off.
And so, as it just re-enforces my concerns that a second opinion will not be fairly reviewed at my local hospital as it won't ever get past Mr Arrogant to start with as he will wave his hand at the multidisciplinary meeting and go 'already made a decision, not revisiting it, next!'
Now just got to wade through the incompetent central referral system to access the choose and book route. They are blaming my GP for their incompetence. He is going to blame them. I will scream at someone soon enough
Luckily, I made the call at work, so I had my professional work head on. It's probably why I now have a manager of the referral team dealing with my case and will personally ensure it gets to where it needs to be, instead of slamming the phone down on an angry patient if I had called from home with my emotional head on 
Told you it would be long 