lucsnowe, Zombie has been going through this process for the past month. This will be a very long post, but I'm copying all the relevant posts from the thread in Chat that has been running.
Valpollicella Wed 05-Mar-14 00:05:00
With Zombie's permission, I'm starting this thread
As many of you know she has had a hideous time through her treatment for cancer.
At the point where she was maybe out of the woods she has been asked to see her surgeon on Friday. Unexpectedly sad
Can we all squeeze her together so her limbs don't go flailing
and do what we vipers do best?
I cannot bear the thought of her going through all the treatment s again after coming out of it before
Prayers, fingers crossing or whatever welcome right now
IamtheZombie Wed 05-Mar-14 13:51:24
I had my annual check-up appointment with my surgeon on 31st January. At last year's appointment she had told me that the protocol for mammograms had changed and I wouldn't need one before this year's appointment. On the 31st I was advised that the protocol had changed again and they would send me an appointment for one. She then examined me and all seemed well. There was absolutely no mention of another appointment this year after the mammogram. It was all "See you next year" chat.
I had the mammogram last Tuesday, 25th February. The radiographer told me that if I hadn't received a letter with the results in about 2 weeks I should ring my surgeon for them.
I had an Oncology Clinic appointment last Thursday. The oncologist also examined me and all seemed well.
That is why I was so shocked and upset yesterday when I opened the letter from the hospital to find an appointment for this Friday morning. All I could think was "Oh, fuck, the mammogram must have shown something that they're concerned about".
I'm doing my best to be positive. If there is a problem it's been discovered at a very early stage.
I'll know for certain with 48 hours.
IamtheZombie Fri 07-Mar-14 13:41:37
The mammogram showed new areas of micro-calcification. Now, all that micro-calcification indicates in and of itself is that there has been damage to the breast tissue, but not what has caused the damage.
I will therefore need to have a biopsy to determine whether the cause is benign or malignant. If it's benign they will just monitor me more closely. If it's malignant it's almost certain to be Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS). DCIS is what I had in this breast 21 years ago. That time it was treated with a local excision (essentially a lumpectomy without the lump) and 6 weeks of radiotherapy. If it is DCIS again, I've told my surgeon that I'd prefer a mastectomy to another local excision. She agrees that would probably be the best course of action.
I should receive an appointment letter early next week for the biopsy. It will be carried out under local anaesthetic in the mammography department. They will be able to do a needle aspiration biopsy while visualising the breast using the mammogram machine.
After that I will be sent another appointment to see my surgeon and discuss what happens next.
So, not the news I wanted but pretty much the news I was expecting. I'm actually fine with it (for now). I've gone into pragmatic one step at a time mode which usually serves me in good stead.
IamtheZombie Tue 18-Mar-14 14:06:59
The appointment letter for Friday arrived in today's post. The biopsy procedure will be a Stereo Core Biopsy.
It was a Core Biopsy that diagnosed the cancer in my right breast. No mammographic imaging was required that time as the lumps were palpable. So at least I know exactly what to expect from that part of the procedure.
When I previously had DCIS in the left breast I had to undergo a Wire Localisation Biopsy. That involved about an hour with the breast in the mammography machine while they took a series of images to locate the microcalcifications and position the tip of the wire in the centre of the affected area. I was then whisked up to theatre for an operation to excise the tissue. I am extremely grateful that technology has moved on so much in the last 21 years.
For anyone who may be interested - or have morbid curiousity ;) - here is a link that fully explains the procedure:
www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=breastbixr
IamtheZombie Fri 21-Mar-14 15:43:29
Once I had stripped to the waist and donned the extremely fetching gown I was seen by the doctor who would be doing the biopsy. She showed me the mammogram so I could see the area that they are concerned about. She then explained step by step what would happen this morning.
Next they took a straight side to side shot which together with the top to bottom shot and the diagonal shot from a few weeks ago gave them more of 3 dimensional target.
I had a short wait while they planned the procedure. Then I was taken back into the mammogram room. I had to lie on my left side on the very edge of the trolley/table and they moved me over to the mammogram machine. They got my breast positioned properly and I then had to NOT move at all until the procedure was over. The doctor cleaned the area she would be going through and gave me a couple of doses of local anaesthetic. Five minutes later she started with a very small incision. Then out came the collection of biopsy needles. She took about 8 or 9 samples with minute adjustments in position between each one.
The final step was making me the proud owner of a tiny titanium tag which was inserted into the area that had been biopsied. That will show up on any future mammograms so that they know exactly where the biopsy was done.
They then converted the table into a chair and I had to sit there for about 5 minutes before going to dress. There was another 10 minute wait and then one of the radiographers checked for any problems and I was out the door.
Getting my results depends on how long it takes pathology to thoroughly analyse the biopsy results. The multi-disciplinary team meet on a Tuesday. If my results are back in time to be discussed at next Tuesday's meeting, I will get the results from my surgeon next Friday. If not, they will be discussed the following Tuesday and I will see my surgeon that Friday.
IamtheZombie Fri 28-Mar-14 14:00:02
I have Grade 2 invasive ductal carcinoma. The results for hormone and HER2 sensitivity aren't back yet.
My mastectomy is scheduled for Thursday, 17th April. In the next week or two I will have an ultrasound examination of the axillary lymph nodes on that side. Those results will help my surgeon decide whether to do a sentinel node biopsy or a full node clearance at the time of the mastectomy.
As I had radiotherapy to this breast 21 years ago when I had DCIS, I cannot have any further radiotherapy.
It is too early to tell whether or not I will need to have more chemotherapy. My surgeon said "You may well be heading towards more chemo but we just don't have enough information yet". That decision will be made once the hormone and HER2 sensitivity results and the full histology results on the tissue removed during the mastectomy are back.
Although it's not what I wanted to hear, it is pretty much what I was expecting to hear.
IamtheZombie Wed 02-Apr-14 13:47:03
I was seen by the same lovely doctor who did my biopsy 12 days ago. I asked her to please be completely honest with me about what the ultrasound revealed.
She explained that she would be looking for signs of any enlargement or irregularity in shape in the lymph nodes. She didn't talk much while actually carrying out the ultrasound. When she finished she said that there are a few nodes that are slightly enlarged / thickened. One reason for that could be an after effect of the biopsy. The only way to find out is to biopsy the nodes. She asked if I wanted her to go ahead do that today. I said yes.
So, armpit injected with local anaesthetic and then 2 samples taken. I didn't feel a thing with the first sample but OUCH on the second one. The pain only lasted a second or two. Poor doctor was very upset that she had hurt me.
Because the biopsy hadn't been pre-planned, I'm not sure when I'll get the results. One of the radiographers popped into the Breast Clinic for me and left a note for my Breast Care Nurse. I may get a call to come back this Friday. If not, I should get them next Friday.
Those results will probably determine whether my surgeon does the sentinel node biopsy or a full node clearance during the mastectomy. There's a huge difference in the post-operative help I'll need depending on which is done.
Quite frankly my gut is telling me that this is a nasty little bugger. The fact that it developed out of nowhere within 14 months to the point of being invasive instead of in situ and now the increasing probability that there is lymph node involvement are not good signs.