Because I'm 99.99% certain it's unnecessary and 100% certain that it will give immense upset and distress to DS1 (2.6). I don't want his first memory to be of going through this procedure
DS1 had a UTI a few month's ago and the hospital wanted to do some further investigations to check that nothing's wrong his waterworks. He's already has ultrasound which showed that all was normal. And now they want to strap him into a machine for 30 minutes to immobilise him whilst they tilt him about and do some imaging. I think he will be completely terrified by this.
(Bizarre coincidence - DS2 had a UTI shortly after birth and had to go through all these tests too, which is how I know what they're like. Now DS2 needed to be checked out, no question. It was pretty bad watching my baby go through these investigations but how much worse with a 2 year old? Too little to understand but big enough to be completely terrified.)
The HV agreed with me that if DS1 had anything wrong with his UT or kidneys he'd have been ill a lot more than just the once and he certainly wouldn't have reached the grand old age of 2.6 without any illness. As far as I can tell the hospital is covering themselves. Don't blame them, they are right to offer the test, but in the circs should I just refuse? Or am I being cavalier about my son's health?
Or am I just a total wus??
I don't mean to cause offence to any mum who's had to watch her children go through much worse than this. My dilemma arises because DS1 is perfectly healthy - and I am so thankful for this.