I had a colonoscopy today and they found no inflamation, no polyps (aparts from piles with mucus filled things on them - yuk, nothing to biopsy.
I have an extra long bit of my colon(sorry not very technical but I was off my head on drugs) and he also tried several times to get into one bit and just couldn't and gave up because it was too twisty, hidden.
His suggestions in this order were:
See dietician and change diet THEN
Think about sorting out polyps ONLY THEN
Drugs for spasms.
As some of you know ds has many allergies and eating as a family is an art form that I have perfected. I am very very rarely ill as a result of something I have eaten. I know what I can and can't have. I get sick on holiday (bummer)and sometimes if I choose badly from a menu. So I think the dietician is pointless really - I know what I can have and it's only when I break my own rules that it all goes wrong. As I get sick on holiday and we are going away in 6 weeks I would not unreasonably like access to the drugs first. If I then manage even better - well I didn't need the dietician did I?
Do I would like to do;
Drugs
Piles in summer holidays
Dietician if I get worse or no better.
Is is reasonable to put this to consultant, as it's basically the opposite to his treatment plan?