I have exclusively breastfed my 3 month old, thinking that it would protect my baby from infections and colds that my 3 year old brings home from playgroup. But since day one he has suffered with awful colds and he has just gotten over what I thought was chicken pox. Ds1 was covered with chicken pox and I was told that ds2 wouldn't get it as he was protected because I have already had it and he was breastfed. But just after ds1 recovered, ds2 started showing the same symptoms. After to days he had just two blisters and I thought it might just be a mild case, but once they had scabbed over other blisters started appearing everywhere, but mainly on neck and face. We went for our post-natel check-up and my (female) gp said that it was definatley chicken pox without any hesitation. Four days later he became very grumpy and wouldn't stop crying, a rash appeared all over his face and I took him down to the walk-in-centre to be told by (male) gp that it was unheard of for a baby so young who was breastfed to catch chicken pox. He then diagnosed not chicken pox but an infection of milk spots. I didn't quite believe a word of it but I didn't want to risk anything so I gave my baby the full course of anti-biotics. He seems fine now apart from another cold bot thankfully milder than the one that he was suffering with beforehand.
Sorry that was very long winded but my questions are - was it chicken pox?
how rare is it exactly for a case of chicken pox to appear in a 9 week old?
why is my milk not protecting him from all of this, I feel like I must be doing something wrong?