I have a 19 month old DS. We went to see a consultant last week because my DH is worried about our DS slightly bow-shaped legs. DH thinks it might be calcium deficency. I am not that worried and nor was the consultant. She said that babies can have bow shaped legs until they are 3 years old. Also in our case it may be hereditary, because my mother and sister have slightly bow-shaped legs as adults !!
My DH has always been very pro-breastfeeding, but thinks that perhaps DS has not had enough calcium due to the fact that I have NEVER given DS any formula milk and I refuse to force him now to like cow's milk. I give him 2 pots of yoghurt per day, which I am told together with bf 4 - 5 times a day should provide him with enough calcium.
In order to have absolute peace of mind, the consultant has suggested a blood test (this coming Monday). I am very reluctant as I don't like the idea of having a needle stuck into my baby. Also DH and I are both very poor blood-givers as in it usually takes 2 tries with a big needle dug deep into our veins to get a proper sample. I think we have deep veins (or were vampires in a previous life ??) If DS has the same problem it will be difficult to get much blood out of his little arms. I was given a cream to put on his hands at least 1 hour before to numb the area I suppose.
Sorry for the long story, but I am convinced the blood test is unneceassy because he is a very healthy looking, very active, very bubbly, breastfed toddler, but DH think it is better to be safe than sorry !!
My question is do you have a child who has had to give a blood sample this young ? If so, did it cause alot of pain and discomfort ?