Who is better qualified to decide?
So I have a car accident my 2nd serious one in a year. GP1 says whiplash prescribes painkillers I get progressively worse after a few days and get sciatica osteopath relieves it then I get much much worse and can barely move and I see a chiropractor
The chiropractor examines me really thoroughly talks to me and tests reflexes strength movement etc and says I might have problems with "bulging discs" one from this year's accident and one from the last and a fair bit of long term damage
I see GP2 explain I've seen a chiropractor but I'd like a second opinion he tells me I've just got a bit of nerve compression and gives me more painkillers and says he doesn't need to examine me (I burst into tears and he says there is no use talking to me I say but I've been misdiagnosed before when GP refused to examine me and I don't want it to happen again as I ended up having very painful surgery when I did have what I thought I had)
I find it hard to sit stand walk drive lie move and constantly need to shift position my bones crack all the time and I have constant pins and needles my legs are so weak (and I'm a keen cyclist and swimmer) I just don't know if I am being pathetic as my doctor says or I'm actually being quite brave for the damage that has been done as the chiropractor says
Problem is the insurance and my work will go on the GPs say so - can anybody share their experiences with me so I can feel a bit less like I'm on my own [floods of tears]