When I was pregnant with DD2 a scan showed up a 'large mass' (their words) and an enlarged nuchal fold (admittedly this was at 14 weeks to an inaccurate time to measure).
I had an amnio and the results only showed that if baby did have SB then it would be a 'closed lesion' and most likely no SB at all. (It was my understanding that a high protein result from the amnio would lead them to believe there was an open lesion but there was no way of knowing if there was a closed one with a low/negative protein count, is that right?). The 3D u/s at 16 weeks showed a normal spine. When I got the result they said that there were no open lesions, but couldn't guarantee a closed one. I forgot to mention this when we were discharged from hospital and hadn't noticed the dimple yet anyway (we went home 6 hours after the birth so everything was still freaky!)
When DD2 was born and I had a proper look I notice a very large dimple at the base of her spine. It looks like she has a second anus! She's still got some lanugo on her back and bottom so its hard to tell if there is actually hair growing on this dimple.
Should I make an appointment with a Dr to have the dimple double checked? Or could it just be because she is so small and scrawny and needs to lay down fat?
Did anyone else have a dimple bottomed baby that just needed to plump out?
I'm not too worried if its SB as it would be a closed lesion and I know that if thats what it is it will, in all likelyhood, not make any difference to her.
But my mum brain is in overdrive so I keep second guessing myself.