@strawberryjelly
Setting aside the Daily Mail's oft lamented history of poor medical reporting, the fact they they have removed the links about what conditions they feel acupuncture is proven to work for is not helpful.
But that's OK, I'm familiar with the review they're talking about and where it is located.
And if I may quote from the summary, I think it supports what I said earlier.
"There is no evidence for an effect of 'true' acupuncture over sham interventions, though this is difficult to interpret, as exact point location could be of limited importance"
(the latter part of that is a symptom of the mish-mash of theory that is acupuncture, do we use Chinese, Japanese, Korean or Western models. If we try to take into account all of them there's hardly any safe area of skin to use for the fake treatment!)
So, as I said, acupuncture doesn't appear to work any better than fake acupuncture.
It is all placebo.
Whether this means people shouldn't use it, I don't know.
But they should absolutely have that information to guide their choice.