Hi All,
I mentioned colic mainly because it was mentioned earlier in this thread and is one of the most common conditions claimed by cranial osteopaths.
However it is certainly not the only condition, similar claims are regularly made that cranial osteopathy can help allergies, asthma, learning difficulties, ADHD, ear infections, excema and even claims for conditions such as cerebral palsy, other forms of brain damage and even threatened miscarriage!
There is no evidence that cranial osteopathy performs any better than a placebo for ANY of these conditions. Only 2 days ago the results of a study into cranial osteopathy and cereral palsy was published in the British Medical Journal. The conclusion of the study was:
" Conclusions This trial found no statistically significant evidence that cranial osteopathy leads to sustained improvement in motor function, pain, sleep or quality of life in children aged 5?12 years with cerebral palsy nor in quality of life of their carers."
Yet these claims are quite common on UK osteopathic websites. The treatment for some of these conditions requireS medical supervision - osteopaths are not medically qualified.
It is very common to see claims that cranial osteopathy is 'gentle, safe and effective'. I agree that it is gentle, in itself it may be safe, as long as the osteopathy convincing a parent to accept treatement doesn't delay or impact on proper medical treatment (some of those conditions are quite serious) - however I disagree with the claims that it is effective. There is no evidence to support that claim, other than some anecdotes and teh assurances of an osteopath (who charges for the treatment.
I really have no problem with people using cranial osteopathy, but do with they would at least look at it objectively.
skepticbarista.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/osteopathya-question-of-evidence-part-1/
skepticbarista.wordpress.com/2011/02/03/osteopathya-question-of-evidence-part-2/
I openly admit that I am not medically qualified, but I have looked closely at the evidence and have spoken to the UK osteopathic statutory regulator, the General Osteopathic Council (GOsC) ..... who are unable to provide evidence and have now started to review their members websites to have many of these claims removed, because (in their words) they may constitute a breach of the ostoepaths code of practice and the Advertsing Standards Authority guidance.
No matter what treatment option people choose, I think it is important to make that decisions based on reliable information/evidence rather than assume it must be ok simply becuase somebody on an internet message board said so.
B.