Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Genealogy

Ancestry updated origins

105 replies

NorthWestWoes · 15/10/2024 20:32

They’ve updated it all very recently. DM now shows as 22% Germanic, I think that was only about 4% before.

A large part of her family tree is south east England - Essex, Sussex, Suffolk. But nothing German or even from the continent unless you go back to 1680, And there are enough DNA matches with the right cousins/ 2nd 3rd cousins to be pretty confident a few generations back. So I’m guessing this is from a strong Saxon/ Angle / Jute ancestry matching quite closely with modern day native Germans.

I only come out as 4% Germanic so even more odd (I know we don’t inherit evenly but her 22% to me 4% is quite a German loss!).

OP posts:
Sparxdislike · 28/10/2024 08:43

I have a great grandmother from Africa but it doesn't show on my ancestry. I guess it's possibly none of that dna passed down to me 🤔 My update removed any Nordic dna and just invreased the Scottish so nothing dramatic. My Oh got a high amount of Germanic Europe.

User100000000000 · 28/10/2024 08:45

Game0fCrones · 15/10/2024 22:20

I wish there was a way to see which country profile came from which parent. All it says is 'Parent 1' and 'Parent 2' - well yes but Who is parent 1?

It does but you have to have a subscription for it. It puts each percentage on whichever side of a 'pie' it came from. Then you can determine which parent is which side of the pie

Jaehee · 28/10/2024 08:47

You can sometimes work out which parent the outlier % came from without a subscription by looking at other matches who share it.

theDudesmummy · 28/10/2024 08:50

I'm sceptical. DH's family name is traceable back to a specific town in the Netherlands. Previously he had a good proportion of "germanic" which covered this. Now this has all been refined specifically down the Belgian, which doesn't make sense.

User100000000000 · 28/10/2024 08:50

@Another2Cats I don't think you understand how it works. It goes back centuries and it depends on how much DNA you have from which parent.

Another2Cats · 28/10/2024 08:52

User100000000000 · 28/10/2024 08:50

@Another2Cats I don't think you understand how it works. It goes back centuries and it depends on how much DNA you have from which parent.

But if neither parent has that DNA then how can I have it?

Theunamedcat · 28/10/2024 08:53

It's awful and makes zero sense we used to be uk wide so a touch of Irish more Welsh and Scottish and predominantly English which makes sense my family historically originated in Ireland on my dad's side passed through Wales and settled in England my moms side came down from Scotland and settled here too

Why am I suddenly German?

FruityShampoo · 28/10/2024 08:59

Another2Cats · 28/10/2024 08:52

But if neither parent has that DNA then how can I have it?

Same as two brown eyed parents can have a blue eyed child.

support.ancestry.com/s/article/Unexpected-Ethnicity-Results?language=en_US

PissedOffNeighbour22 · 28/10/2024 09:02

I've gone from being 98% English to around 69% which seems a huge drop. I've gained a load of Germanic results and lost my Scandinavian ones.

My 4yr old randomly asked yesterday what it means to be English. DP told her there was no point asking mummy seeing as she's apparently German 😂

Jaehee · 28/10/2024 09:10

Theunamedcat · 28/10/2024 08:53

It's awful and makes zero sense we used to be uk wide so a touch of Irish more Welsh and Scottish and predominantly English which makes sense my family historically originated in Ireland on my dad's side passed through Wales and settled in England my moms side came down from Scotland and settled here too

Why am I suddenly German?

It’s presumably Anglo-Saxon heritage, it’s more specific

MaloryJones · 28/10/2024 09:24

DuckBushCityLimit · 15/10/2024 22:30

It's pretty obvious with mine - my mum is very English, and the 57 varieties come from my dad! I notice they've made the parent information available to paying subscribers only, though, so I can't see it any more.

Yes, luckily for Me it was the same with my Parents on there

Only Me and my Dad had Welsh ancestors (Morgan, v Welsh) and I have the same as Dad. 2% Welsh DNA.
Deduced Dad was "Parent 2" on ancestry.

Another2Cats · 28/10/2024 10:27

FruityShampoo · 28/10/2024 08:59

Same as two brown eyed parents can have a blue eyed child.

support.ancestry.com/s/article/Unexpected-Ethnicity-Results?language=en_US

That analogy is incorrect and the Ancestry link isn't appropriate to this situation either (it shows the reverse situation, if anything)

To take the eye colour thing, yes, of course it is possible for two brown eyed parents to have a blue eyed child or two blue eyed parents to have a brown eyed child. But that is entirely different to the situation that we're talking about here.

In that analogy, (to keep things very basic) you look at your parents DNA and find that they each have a brown eyed gene and a blue eyed gene. So what you are depends on what you inherit from your parents. But that is not what we are talking about.

The correct analogy is, instead of having parents with both a brown eyed gene and blue eyed gene, you check your parents DNA and find that they both only have a gene for brown eyes (although eye colour doesn't actually work like that).

Ancestry then come along and say that you have the gene for blue eyes even though neither of your parents had that gene when they were tested.
.

Also, with the Ancestry link, that explains why you might not inherit some regions from a parent. It does not explain why you have regions that neither of your parents do.

If I have inherited a "Basque" region then, if it were accurate, that Basque region must also be present in one of my parents - otherwise I could not have inherited it.

Ancestry says that this region is not present in either of my parents.

Jaehee · 28/10/2024 13:25

Another2Cats · 28/10/2024 10:27

That analogy is incorrect and the Ancestry link isn't appropriate to this situation either (it shows the reverse situation, if anything)

To take the eye colour thing, yes, of course it is possible for two brown eyed parents to have a blue eyed child or two blue eyed parents to have a brown eyed child. But that is entirely different to the situation that we're talking about here.

In that analogy, (to keep things very basic) you look at your parents DNA and find that they each have a brown eyed gene and a blue eyed gene. So what you are depends on what you inherit from your parents. But that is not what we are talking about.

The correct analogy is, instead of having parents with both a brown eyed gene and blue eyed gene, you check your parents DNA and find that they both only have a gene for brown eyes (although eye colour doesn't actually work like that).

Ancestry then come along and say that you have the gene for blue eyes even though neither of your parents had that gene when they were tested.
.

Also, with the Ancestry link, that explains why you might not inherit some regions from a parent. It does not explain why you have regions that neither of your parents do.

If I have inherited a "Basque" region then, if it were accurate, that Basque region must also be present in one of my parents - otherwise I could not have inherited it.

Ancestry says that this region is not present in either of my parents.

Does your father have any % France or Spain?

Christwosheds · 28/10/2024 13:29

LadyGaGasPokerFace · 15/10/2024 22:53

I’ve just found out today I’m matching 25% DNA with someone. 1,742cm 😳

That is often a half sibling, or could be an uncle/aunt ?

Christwosheds · 28/10/2024 13:41

FruityShampoo · 28/10/2024 08:59

Same as two brown eyed parents can have a blue eyed child.

support.ancestry.com/s/article/Unexpected-Ethnicity-Results?language=en_US

No, if a parent has no dna from an area then you can’t have it. That isn’t the same as eye colour which is to do with gene expression.

Another2Cats · 28/10/2024 13:47

Jaehee · 28/10/2024 13:25

Does your father have any % France or Spain?

I gave the figures near the start of the thread, but no, neither of my parents do.

Father:

England & Northwestern Europe 77%
Germanic Europe 11%
Wales 9%
Denmark 3%

Mother:

England & Northwestern Europe 92%
Germanic Europe 4%
The Netherlands 2%
Cornwall 2%

Me:

England & Northwestern Europe 79%
Germanic Europe 13%
The Netherlands 6%
Norway 1%
Basque 1%

PreFabBroadBean · 28/10/2024 13:49

No, if a parent has no dna from an area then you can’t have it.
Obviously, the test results are a marketing tool to sell the product, rather than a complicated scientific paper. 🙂However, here's my theory.

Perhaps it's because in every test, a) some DNA won't actually be successfully tested. and b) 100% of the DNA isn't being tested for "nationality", just a few marker segments. If, say, that particular marker is in a segment from the dad that happens not to be tested successfully, but that marker is tested successfully in the child, that could explain it.

Another2Cats · 28/10/2024 13:58

@Jaehee Just to add to my earlier comment, the previous origins before the update made more sense

Father:

England & Northwestern Europe 69%
Wales 20%
Scotland 8%
Norway 2%
Ireland 1%

Mother:

England & Northwestern Europe 79%
Wales 9%
Norway 8%
Germanic Europe 2%
Scotland 2%

Me:

England & Northwestern Europe 73%
Wales 15%
Scotland 10%
Norway 2%

PreFabBroadBean · 28/10/2024 14:01

Another2Cats
That's quite a difference, isn't it, even with the Netherlands. Perhaps they attribute it to "rounding errors" like maths problems 😂

Can you email Ancestry and ask for their view? I'd be interested to know their reply.

Mercury2702 · 28/10/2024 14:16

I’ve gone from

England 72%
Scotland 9%
Ireland 9%
Sweden & Denmark 7%
Norway 3%

to

England 83%
Germanic Europe 11%
Scotland 6% 🤔

newrubylane · 28/10/2024 14:18

NorthWestWoes · 16/10/2024 09:24

I feel as though it made more sense before the change. The tiny percentages will always be a bit random and a high probability of being wrong. And I can understand that maybe a millennium of south east ancestry could show up as being partly Germanic.

But the other changes don’t match the family tree, whereas before it made sense. And the inheritance I get from my mum is oddly out of kilter compared to what shows up on her account. Looks like I took all her Scottish genes (which are now oddly high anyway given her Scottish ancestry should be 5 or 6 generations back) but hardly any of her heavily Germanic DNA.

This. I have both me and my parents tested, and my parental breakdown ethnicity estimate doesn't match up with their ethnicity estimates, which has me mystified. For instance, I apparently got my Scottish (9 per cent) from my mum. But her DNA test only estimates 1 per cent Scottish. And my dad only has 3%, so there's no possibility mixing up my parent 1 and parent 2 is responsible. The maths just doesn't work out any which way.

PreFabBroadBean · 28/10/2024 14:24

It's making me think there's a mistake in the algorithm. You would think that Ancestry would have made sure the program adjusted for that, to prevent it from happening. The results are total (gu)estimations, so their program could surely have taken this into account. 🙂

Jaehee · 28/10/2024 14:30

@Another2Cats I've just had a look at my own. According to Ancestry's boundaries, the England & Northwestern Europe region also covers (weakly) part of the Basque region. So it's possible some of yours has been calculated as Basque while your parents' DNA has been lumped in with E&NWE. I think what was my 'Ireland' has now been lumped in with Germanic Europe. I have also acquired 1% Basque.

The more I try to get my head around it the more I get confused.

TheCoolOliveBalonz · 28/10/2024 14:43

My Scottish ancestry has gone from ludicrously high to strangely low. Before it was nearly 70 percent now it's 10. My grandfather was very Scottish with a family tree in one area going back centuries. All matches via him show as nearly all Scottish. No other Scottish ancestry. Other than that, this update does look more like what I might expect from my family trees.

Christwosheds · 28/10/2024 15:57

PreFabBroadBean · 28/10/2024 14:24

It's making me think there's a mistake in the algorithm. You would think that Ancestry would have made sure the program adjusted for that, to prevent it from happening. The results are total (gu)estimations, so their program could surely have taken this into account. 🙂

I agree the new results don’t seem as accurate as the previous ones.

Swipe left for the next trending thread