It's been a very big shock to my system having a dyslexic child (especially DD's level of it) and meant a completely mental re-evaluation of how our exam systems work. I'm the polar opposite of dyslexic, and while DH is, his is the kind where he needs someone to proof read but didn't stop him getting As in everything and humanities at Oxbridge.
DD's was picked up very early - primary paid for their Ed Psych to do comprehensive testing as soon as she was 7 as she couldn't read. She has an incredibly spiky profile. But there was never any intervention or support beyond getting her through the phonics test. We were London at the time and the resources were there for testing.
CAT scores at secondary meant she had targets of 8 for every subject - and was never going to get anywhere near that sadly due to her struggles with reading and SPaG.
I don't really understand how councils can just decide that something doesn't exist when there are so many examples of children who are intelligent but literally disabled. And even when you have involved and motivated parents it's incredibly hard to find resources or interventions that help - and the older they get, the more resistant the child is to doing things that are boring and emphasise their weaknesses.
I have no idea how you could run systems like GCSE and A level and make any kind of level playing field that would be acceptable and fair to all. We have found that BTEC is the answer for DD - the format allows her to gain the marks that reflect her actual ability and ignores her disabilities. (Again concerns me that governments are looking at cutting these). I am at least glad that 6th form and university will be easier for her in this regard.
I don't know what the criteria are for having software, but I was told that it would not be allowed - and that examiners were used to interpreting without penalising.
Had DD been allowed editing software for the exams, her writing would look more like mine (with the odd error where the system accepts her mis-spelling as a different word from the one intended) and would have been easy for an examiner to read for content and analysis without having to employ crypto-analysis before marking!
I've put in for both English Literature papers - she got very similar scores on both - a 6 on paper 1 and just missed a 6 on paper 2 giving her a 5 overall and a couple of marks off the boundary.
Then the anomaly is the English Language where she got a 3 on Paper 1 and 6 on paper 2 giving her a 4 overall. However, paper 1 Lang is invariably her best English paper in every exam and mock since I can remember. She's a long way off the 5 and very close to the 4/3 boundary, but I do wonder if hers could be one of those papers that sees a big jump because the examiner was tired and couldn't be bothered.
She's got the passes - but is very disappointed, and it has damaged her confidence.
I've asked the teachers to look first - so waiting to hear... and starting to bite nails, but don't want to bug them.