ah, interesting. i don't have any problem with the book, it's about a fictional heroine, kate and her fictional husband, guy (and i actually think i may have read it at some dim and distant point in the past...) but the dm article appears as a bang up to date story about annie and her (ex) husband paul, as a topical bit about real life being married to the military.
book - yy fair play. there's only so much to do when your partner's deployed and the kids are in bed - yy draw on your life and embellish it. everyone's got a stroy in them yada yada.
article in the fail - she's obviously skint and churning out the same stuff as 'how it is', having forgotten it was published as a story ten years ago and she didn't get it right then.
let's hope she got paul and all of the 'rcw's permission to get their picture published on the www. because i'd be mightily pissed off to have my face emblazoned all over the fail as a mentalist stepford wife. and i'd probably be suing her and them for defamation of character (or whatever it's called).
are you in the pic, shirl? 