Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Food/recipes

For related content, visit our food content hub.

Food for baby - which would you choose? Organic chicken thigh or normal chicken breast?

18 replies

greenday · 12/05/2008 13:38

nutrition-wise of course.

Was at sainsbury today with that dilemma so I thought I'd ask the MN minds to see if I made the right decision ...

OP posts:
donnie · 12/05/2008 13:40

thigh tastes a lot better, loads more flavour. can't comment on nutritional value though - are they not roughly the same?

theyoungvisiter · 12/05/2008 13:40

organic thigh every time - for me or for baby - much tastier too!

Lenniegirl · 12/05/2008 13:41

organic.

theyoungvisiter · 12/05/2008 13:41

donnie, I think it was the organic vs non-organic that was the issue nutrition-wise.

MrsBadger · 12/05/2008 13:42

thigh every time
I barely use chicken breasts for anything anymore

AitchTwoCiao · 12/05/2008 13:42

when i was weaning dd she loved chicken leg and thigh more than breast, which was a bit dry. personally i'd always have the darker meat as well, it's got more flavour. plus there's the conditions it's been raised in, of course.

donnie · 12/05/2008 13:43

oh yes, sorry - I see now!

organic of course!

alarkaspree · 12/05/2008 13:44

definitely thigh, won't go dry and stringy either.

Only downside is the cutting up aspect, thighs tend to be sold bone-in so if you don't want to cook it like that I would get it from the butcher next time and get them to take the bones out for you.

MrsBadger · 12/05/2008 13:50

I'll let you in on a secret here: Waitrose do thigh fillets

well worth the extra cash vs time spent filleting the buggers

theyoungvisiter · 12/05/2008 13:52

sainsburys also do organic thigh fillets - Waitrose ones are nicer though!

vonsudenfed · 12/05/2008 13:53

Dd wouldn't eat chicken breast when she was teething badly, it was too dense and chewy, so thighs every time.

I save having to fillet them by stewing them with whatever and then taking the meat off the bone when it's cooked - you end up with more flavour too like that.

AitchTwoCiao · 12/05/2008 13:53

yes, i got the sainsbos ones the other day and they were bogging. skinless and boneless but still with a lot of fat on them. barf.

witchandchips · 12/05/2008 13:53

rule of thumb for chicken is to get the cheapest cut (thigh, wing) on the most expensive free range bird

MrsBadger · 12/05/2008 13:56

oh usually I casserole etc them too, tis just for stirfries and things
or lazy jar curry for DH and me

greenday · 12/05/2008 14:02

I always thought chicken breast has more nutritional value than thigh ... hence my dilemma. And in some meat and veg, it makes no difference if its organic or not.
But I'm glad I made the right decision - got the organic thigh instead.
Planning to make a casserole so deboning them for baby's food will be easy-peasy!

OP posts:
bundle · 12/05/2008 14:03

thighs every time esp if freerange or organic

theyoungvisiter · 12/05/2008 20:48

depends what you call nutritional value - chicken breast is very low fat, slightly lower fat than thigh, so if you need to be on a low fat diet it probably is preferable. But a baby doesn't need to worry about that!

In other terms I don't think there would be much difference? I don't know for sure - I'm not a nutritionalist - but I can't imagine it would be very different...? It's just different types of muscle isn't it.

VacantlyPretty · 12/05/2008 20:49

Message withdrawn

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread